Federal impacts to ag conservation in Wisconsin ‘complex’

(PUBLIC NEWS SERVICE) – Wisconsin’s agriculture industry could see both wins and losses under the new federal budget.

Climate change isn’t a priority for the Trump administration, so the new budget redirects funds for farm conservation initiatives.

Chuck Anderas, policy director for the Michael Fields Agricultural Institute, said it lacks investments in key areas, such as technical assistance, to help farmers implement conservation measures.

Anderas predicted the gutted support – and incentives that will go to large farms that need it least – will weaken conservation efforts and could have long-term implications.

“And so, you’re having more runoff and more nitrates in the drinking water,” he said. “But then you’re also having birth defects in babies from the nitrates in the drinking water, and you’re having huge medical costs beyond the devastating effects to human health from that.”

Wisconsin’s new state budget does include some funding for programs that incentivize farmers to use conservation practices and reduce nitrogen pollution. Anderas said this kind of investment will help prevent flood damage, improve water quality and make agricultural systems more resilient – all of which affect public health.

As part of its agenda to curb government fraud and waste, the Trump administration has slashed staffing at agencies such as the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service. The new budget proposes cutting nearly one-third of additional staff.

Anderas says that agency provides critical technical assistance to farmers – and the lack of support will create barriers for farmers who rely on its guidance.

“Everybody downstream from a farmer doing conservation practices benefits from that, because there’s less water running off their fields, there’s less nitrates in the drinking water, there’s less phosphorus in our streams and rivers,” he said. “And the very best people helping people to do that have been NRCS staff.”

Anderas said the new federal ag budget appears to mostly benefit large farms through commodity payments and crop insurance, while small and midsize farms primarily rely on conservation programs.

“And a lot of that’s been paid for at the expense of SNAP benefits,” he said. “And so, that’s basically the choice that’s been made in this budget bill is, continue investing more and more in the largest farms, and invest less in people and in small and medium-sized farms.”

He added that the new federal budget also redirects Biden-era conservation funds that hadn’t yet been used away from practices that would reduce greenhouse gas emissions on farms.

---

Disclosure: Michael Fields Agricultural Institute contributes to Public News Service’s fund for reporting on Hunger/Food/Nutrition, Rural/Farming, Sustainable Agriculture. If you would like to help support news in the public interest, click here.

---

This article originally appeared on Public News Service.