
Wisconsin wakes up here.
Back to Daybreak with Brian and JB.
Welcome.
Now we're number two of the big show.
Glad you're here.
Jamie is out this week doing business for the company on the East Coast because she's an executive here at the company.
She wears many hats, so she has been
pulled out there to do some business.
But have no fear.
Daybreak is here every morning.
8-5-5-7-5 Civic is how you get ahold of us.
And if you call him, be nice to Parker because to get to me, you've got to get through him.
So be very nice.
All right, it is the top of the hour.
That means it's time for some you need to know.
It's a wake up call in more ways than one.
Time for some you need to know.
All right, we started talking about this on the show within a show real quickly.
Two passengers have tested positive for Hunter virus as a third one shows symptoms after the cruise ship has been evacuated.
A French woman and two Americans tested positive or showed symptoms of Hunter virus this morning as nations around the world scrambled to repatriate passengers from a cruise ship hit by an outbreak and quarantine or isolate them.
One of the 17 American passengers evacuated from the ship and flown to Nebraska also tested positive for the hunt to virus, but is not showing any symptoms.
Another had mild symptoms.
US health officials said late yesterday.
Now the flight landed in the early hours today and stopped near buses and police vehicles.
They are in Nebraska.
The Americans were first taken to the University of Nebraska Medical Center, which has a federally funded quarantine facility to assess whether they have
been in close contact with any symptomatic people and their risk levels for spreading the virus.
Now before you start to panic I'm looking at you Parker who director of the World Health Organization which you know we're not really part of anymore but we can still get reports from the World Health Organization.
The director has stressed that the general public should not be worried about the outbreak.
This is not another COVID, he said, and the risk to the public is low, so they shouldn't be scared and they shouldn't panic.
So just keep an eye on things.
Because quite frankly, and I'm, man, please, I'm not hoping for this at all.
But if God forbid something were to start spreading, I do not trust our administration to handle it well based on past
experience and based on yesterday when the president said we have it well under control I think we have it under control okay this is you know but right now again we're not trying to spread panic or hysteria nothing to worry about yet just know that it's there know that they're monitoring the people who were on the ship and you know if anything changes we'll keep an eye on it all right some other stuff you need to know this hits closer to home
Wes Edens.
You might know that name because he is the billionaire co-owner of the Milwaukee Bucks.
He's been identified as the victim of an alleged one billion dollar extortion scheme following a brief torrid love affair which are the best kinds.
Now this is according to reporting in the Washington or the Wall Street Journal rather the charges filed in federal court do not publicly identify Edens
But the Wall Street Journal confirmed he is the person described in the indictment.
The case is set to go to trial later this year.
News of the alleged black male comes the same day as Eden's daughter Mallory was set to represent the Bucks at the 2026 NBA Draft Lottery.
Prosecutors have charged a 46 year old woman with black male extortion and other charges in the alleged shakedown.
It continued for months starting in late 2024 and went through spring of 2025.
The black male reportedly began following the solution of a brief romantic relationship between Eden's and
the woman.
Now, according to court records and the Wall Street Journal, she threatened to publicize photographs and videos of Xi'anines in compromising positions if Eden did not pay her more than one billion dollars.
Wow.
And you thought having to buy a girl a dinner was expensive, Parker.
That is, that's less than a billion.
She even reached out to Eden's family members, told him she would approach investors and pledged to destroy him.
You know what they say about hell hath no fury.
She reportedly accused Eden's of having
sex with her while she was mentally incapacitated and told him the cameras in her home had recorded everything he did to her.
He denied the claims but reportedly participated in the scheme to avoid public embarrassment and to prevent his family from being harassed.
Court records show he previously agreed to settle the matter for $6.5 million with a million dollars up front.
A spokesperson for Edens told the Wall Street Journal Mr. Edens will be making no comment on the case as the indictment speaks for itself with
to the charges against the defendant.
Man, that is a horror story.
That is some fatal attraction kind of stuff right there.
Unbelievable.
I've dated some crazy women in the past, Parker.
I know that probably surprises you.
But since I didn't have multi-billions of dollars, none of them tried to, won't throw a brick at me, but none of them tried to extort money off me, which I guess is good.
There you go.
What I cannot dodge is more stuff we need to know.
See how I did that?
Yeah.
So Iran has responded to the latest U.S.
proposal to end the war according to their state media yesterday.
That's after an exchange of hostilities that followed the Strait of Hormuz.
hostilities around the Strait of Hormuz in recent days, highlighted by the fragility of a ceasefire the two sides reached more than a month ago, which if you've been following the news over the weekend, we've been shooting at each other.
So I don't know about the ceasefire.
Well, of course, as soon as Iran sent this message to and ceasefire proposal via Pakistani mediators, saying they wanted to do negotiations to focus on permanently ending the war, but...
Guess what our president quickly said.
Well, he rejected it as totally unacceptable in capital letters on truth social.
Put no other details in there, just totally unacceptable, which is kind of par for the course for the way that this administration is dealing with international relations, where we don't sit down and negotiate because
Well, they'll call us is what the president told us before.
So still waiting for that call, even though the message did come in through Pakistani mediators.
Now this one is totally unacceptable.
So on Iran's front, they seek to end the war on all fronts, including in Lebanon, where Israel is fighting the Iranian backed Hezbollah militant group and to ensure the security of shipping state.
of shipping rather, state TV said.
So Washington's latest proposal addressed a deal to end the war, reopen the strait and roll back Iran's nuclear program.
So earlier yesterday on social media, the president accused Tehran of quote unquote, playing games with the United States for nearly 50 years, adding they will be laughing no longer.
So again, resorting to threats, saying they're now, again,
the Iranian regime is not to be trusted either.
But at least there are, we're finding out through other channels, through the Pakistani mediators, that there are proposals coming that way.
We do not, we're giving all or nothing ultimatums.
We have decided we as a country, and by we, I mean the administration, because I surely do not share their viewpoints, the administration has decided that
Ultimatums are better than negotiations and this is a All-in Win or lose there is there can be no subtlety there can be no compromise it is a zero-sum game We've got to either we're either going to win Which who knows what win means in Donald Trump's world now since he hasn't really given us even a reason why we're there that's
reliable in any way.
So how is this going to ever change?
Because his idea of diplomacy is sitting on its truth social typing in all caps.
Now the president did say he's giving diplomacy every chance we possibly can before going back to hostilities That actually was not the president that was ambassador to the UN Mike waltz on ABC yesterday Iran's new supreme leader who has not been seen or heard
publicly since the war began issued new and decisive directives for the continuation of operations and the powerful confrontation with enemies while meeting with the head of the joint military command that according to state broadcasting in Iran.
Now the fragile ceasefire was tested if you were paying attention over the weekend and quite frankly I would not blame you if you weren't.
If you can find a data completely unplugged from all of this
Take it take it when you can because I have a feeling all the bad news is still gonna be there with more piled on top of it if you take that day to unwind So the fragile ceasefire was tested when a drone ignited a small fire on a ship off Qatar and the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait reported drones entering their airspace the UAE said it shot down two drones and Blamed Iran no casualties reported no one immediately claimed responsibility
Qatar's foreign ministry called the ship attack a dangerous and unacceptable escalation that threatens the security and safety of maritime trade routes and vital supplies in the region.
The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations Center gave no details about the ship's owner or origin.
Now the president has reiterated his threats.
To resume full-scale bombing if Iran Iran does not accept an agreement to reopen the straight and rollback its nuclear program Iran has largely blocked the strategic waterway That's key as you know as we've said many times to the global flow of oil natural gas and fertilizer So the markets are going up.
We're all paying more at the pump the negotiations are not happening because
the president doesn't want to keep sending people over to Iran or to Pakistan to meet with Iran.
So we're stuck with a president who is, even if there are negotiations going on on back channels and in, you know, behind closed doors, his public taunts on true social are setting all those negotiations back if they're even happening.
So, okay.
Well, guess what?
Closer to home, the FBI has decided they are going to investigate Wisconsin's 2020 election.
Yes, remember 2020?
That was six years ago.
Remember who lost that election?
The current president.
You know who can't let it go?
the current president.
The FBI has started an investigation into Wisconsin's 2020 election that according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinels reporting and talking to some sources, the investigation is only in a preliminary phase.
It's focused on vetting previous complaints and no ballots have been seized in Wisconsin to this point according to the sources.
Now confirmation of the probe came as the Journal Sentinel reported that an FBI agent had interviewed a state election official in recent days.
The agent spoke with Wisconsin Elections Commission Deputy Administrator Robert Keough and discussed how elections are handled in Wisconsin.
We've covered this so many times.
We told you how elections were covered here.
You audited those elections and everything was fine.
So the president, as you know, repeatedly, falsely claimed that he won the 2020 election.
The recount in two Wisconsin counties that his campaign paid for, court rulings, a state audit, and a conservative review have all confirmed that Trump lost not only in Wisconsin, but the entire election, but in Wisconsin it has been litigated and investigated and checked over.
According to a spokeswoman for the Wisconsin Elections Commission, we are not aware of an active investigation, but they have been preparing for an investigation, especially in Milwaukee.
So he's focusing on Georgia, Arizona and Wisconsin.
They've all been central in his false claims that he won the 2020 election.
Remember, oh, in the middle of the night, all of a sudden, he says, oh, there were all the dumps, the vote dumps and the ballot dumps.
And it's just stop.
Just stop, but it will not stop and so neither will we because Parker I'm nothing if not a man who will not quit.
I'm like a dog with a bone We're gonna stay on top of this and you can stay on top of it with us right here on daybreak.
I'm Brian Newton and this
Charlotte Hornets are Miles Bridges was granted a restraining order against his ex Michelle Johnson.
So this comes after Miles made a claim in court saying his ex abandoned their four kids with a nanny drove to the Spectrum Center while intoxicated rented a room at a nearby hotel.
stationed an accomplice in the lobby and crouched behind Miles parked car at the facility's garage to tamper with his tires while he was on the court playing for the Hornets.
The petition also claims that Michelle launched a cyber attack on him and his lawyer in the days following.
He claims she created a fake phone number to send him a text with his home address to scare him.
Look, I think we've all had some relationships that didn't go the way we expected.
And maybe they didn't have a graceful ending.
Maybe you broke up with her a week before prom and decided to still take her.
Yeah.
Oh Almost as bad as yeah, Jeffrey anyway mark up seeing the brother of the disgrace New York financier says that the suicide note that was recently found is fake done mark
Mark Epstein told Business Insider that he's seen the note and he's not buying it, claiming it would be the easiest effing thing for a forger to whip up a fake one.
The note includes a line which reads, what you want me to do, bust out crying, which references the little rascals, and Jeffrey Epstein put similar remarks in emails he sent Mark and others.
Mark says all this proves is that a forger had access to the Epstein files, which they used to mimic his brother's voice in the forgery.
He said it's public knowledge.
It's in the email.
So they stole it from me to make it sound like it was him.
It's also worth noting the court documents indicate this note was sealed in 2021 long before the files were released.
Well done.
So he's he's taking the social media to beg to get back into major league baseball.
He said, hypothetical, you're the owner of an MLB team.
I offered to take zero dollar salary and sign a minor league contract and go to low A ball.
If the he sucks now crowd is right and I get lit up, you cut me, you lose no money and there's no risk.
to being in the big leagues.
He said, if the clubhouse cancer crowd is right, you see it immediately at low A and cut me.
You lose zero dollars and there's no risk.
Parker's giving me 20 seconds, so I got to wrap up.
This is Daybreak.
The local voices and statewide impact.
It's Daybreak with Brian and Jamie.
Welcome back to the program.
This is Daybreak.
I'm Brian Noon and Jamie is out this week, but we'll rejoin us next Monday if you need.
hardware.
If you need home improvement, maybe you need subsiding.
Maybe even if you need groceries and you're in Wisconsin, there is a good chance you have gone to Menards to get those things.
Well, last month, an Eau Claire County jury awarded five and a half million dollars to a Menards worker who was injured on the job at the company's distribution center.
The case had been in court since 2020.
So what are your rights if you're injured at work and what message does this verdict send to other companies in Wisconsin and beyond?
Attorney Chris McGillis
of the McGillis Law Group represented the worker in this case and joins me now.
Chris, thanks for being here.
Appreciate your time this morning.
So for those of us who only heard about the case through some short news reports, give us a little background on this case.
Yeah, no, thank you, Brian.
Thanks so much for having me.
Really appreciate it.
Love your show.
The background of the case is our client was delivering freight to one of Menards distribution centers.
And unfortunately,
Because of lack of training lack of supervision.
He was seriously injured when freight fell off the truck when it was being moved by a forklift operator.
so a little complicated factually but the forklift operator was a temporary employee that Menards used at their distribution center.
client was a truck driver that delivered freight
for minars and for other companies in the area.
A significant head injury, laceration to the head.
It was it was pretty graphic.
So what as you as you take this case, and your law firm, like I said, McGillis.com is the website, you're you're you took the case.
What is your argument then against Monars?
What's the basis of the case or what was the basis of the case?
Because as we said, it's already been adjudicated and the settlement's been in.
Yeah, thanks, Bryce.
So the main reason why these cases are so important is because not only about the individual that's injured, but it's also about the community and the workers and the people that are there.
So when a case like this comes down from the jury,
It's sending a message that workplace safety is extremely important.
We all know when you work somewhere, you have to be trained, you have to be supervised, you have to understand how to use the equipment that you're operating with.
And the big thing here, why we stood up to Menards is because Menards was not making sure their employees were supervised.
They were not making sure that they were trained properly on using dangerous equipment.
Well, it was somewhat complicated because we had a temporary employee involved.
But the bottom line is that, so OSHA, we all have heard of OSHA, right?
OSHA has very clear guidelines on what's required for these types of jobs, these types of employees, these types of work.
And Menards just simply didn't follow it.
And they attempted to shift blame, deflect.
put responsibility on other people, including our client.
And so part of that process, the vindication from the juries is the jury said there was zero fault on our client for doing anything on that day.
No, it's a great question, Brian.
So we were in Menards hometown.
We were in Eau Claire County.
And what we found was we found honest, fair jurors.
You know, people that had strong feelings on both sides.
But what we asked for is we wanted jurors that were neutral, that were fair when that would listen to the evidence.
And that's what they did.
But what we know is that based on the case that came in, the jury felt strongly that Menards violated the safety rules.
And that's, again, that's what's important.
That's how you make change.
And that's why this case is so important because it sends a signal to corporations in the state of Wisconsin, frankly, throughout the country, that if you violate known safety rules, you will be held responsible.
No, that's a great question, Brian.
So OSHA doesn't get involved unless the employer or the employee make a complaint.
So they don't actively, you know, they there's not like a message that gets sent out by carrier pigeon to OSHA when something happens.
That was an issue in the case.
So we thought we brought that to the jury's attention and they consider that evidence.
Menards did not notify OSHA.
No, he was not an employee of Menards.
Wisconsin has workers compensation exclusivity.
He was considered an independent worker.
So he had his own company and he
delivering freight from one Menards to another.
Yeah, I mean, there are varying degrees of responsibility.
I think the employee could notify OSHA, the employer could notify OSHA.
There are certain criteria that would be met.
But what I would tell the public is this, your viewers, if you're involved in a workplace incident, and you don't believe somebody was trained, you don't believe someone was certified, you think that someone's cutting corners on safety,
notify OSHA, call an attorney that's experienced in these types of injuries because that's the only way to make change is standing up and saying, hey, time out.
We're not going to let you expose our team, our customers, our community to this type of
That sounds good, but I'm sure you've run into this.
And I'm talking to Chris McGillis of McGillis Law Group.
He is the attorney that handled this case with the worker and the Menards verdict.
I'm sure you have talked to people who think they have, they've been injured at work.
There's no doubt about that.
But if they complain or if they file with OSHA, there's going to be some sort of retribution.
Maybe they lose their job.
What rights do workers have if they have been injured?
to pursue either a complaint with OSHA or to pursue some sort of legal action to make sure if the company they work for is not taking care of them.
Yeah, workers have rights.
And one of those rights is to pursue your civil claim for injury.
If an employer is retaliating against someone, I'm not an employment lawyer, but if someone's retaliating against a worker for filing a legitimate claim,
I would highly, highly recommend them to talk to an employment lawyer.
I don't think that is okay.
And we have to be comfortable, even though it's hard, we have to be comfortable standing up and having the courage.
And that's the word I use.
You have to have the courage to stand up because that's the only way change comes, Brian.
You have to voice your concern.
You have to say, no, this isn't right.
And I'm not saying do that in every case.
I'm not saying a frivolous lawsuit.
But when this is a legitimate thing,
And in this case it was.
I mean, the jury overwhelmingly said 100% on the operator Menards.
This wasn't, you know, well, we're not really sure.
was with us having the burden of proof.
We met our burden of proof with the evidence in trial.
It sounds like I'm just using this Menards case as a blueprint.
It sounds unbelievable to me that
police officers and firefighters would have to sue because they're not being taken care of by their own departments.
Is that more widespread than we would think?
Yeah, Brian, we have a special relationship with first responders.
We work with police and firefighting units across the state of Wisconsin.
Being able to protect people that protect you is a special thing.
And we really, really take that seriously.
We deal with first responder injuries, first responder, you know, squad crashes, truck crashes, injuries all the time.
And you'd be surprised.
Sometimes, Brian, sometimes it happens because people are being lazy because they don't know the rules.
And sometimes things just happen.
And sometimes, yeah, sometimes there are just accidents.
But the big thing is understanding that if you are injured and you didn't do anything wrong, being able to have that address, because it's not fair to, for example, a first responder or a truck driver or anybody to be shouldered with your bills, your medical expenses, your mortgage, and you're left holding the bag when someone else makes a mistake.
So what we told the jury, Brian, was we said, hey,
this our client didn't do anything wrong.
He was just trying to do his job.
And that's what he told the jury.
So it's not fair to me that when I'm just trying to do my job, and someone else isn't following the safety rules, that I have to shoulder 100% of that fault.
No, and that's I mean, I don't think there's anybody who would hear you say that go, Well, that doesn't sound right.
No, if you're just you're going about your business doing your job, everybody should be doing this is something I know I'm not the only one who's wondered about this.
But
the jury awarded your client 5.5 million.
We hear different injury cases, different dollar amounts.
Behind the scenes, and not this case in particular, but just in general, when you're going to a case, how are those numbers decided?
Is it how much you ask?
How do you decide how much to seek in your lawsuit?
How does the jury decide how much to award?
Where does all that math happen?
Right.
So there are two main things, economic damages and non-economic damages.
My biggest piece of advice for your viewers, Brian, is to hire an experienced lawyer that has a track record of winning and winning verdicts that make a difference.
Because those people, those lawyers will understand how to articulate your interest and put forth the best case they can for you.
Absolutely.
So economic, which would be medical bills, wage loss, things like that.
Those are things that you can quantify with math.
then non-economic damages.
So pain and suffering, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment.
In Wisconsin, those are all things we can recover under our jury instructions.
question.
It's a great question.
So again, I would say to you is experience, having a lawyer that has experience articulating how that works and then being able to explain to the jury the things that have been taken and tell the story of the client to the jury.
Okay, and then they figure out well this person could have made X amount if they were able to continue with their careers and It's always and I don't I'm not asking that question to discount mental anguish or pain and suffering I just always wondered how you quantify that because one person suffering is yeah
Can I tell in this way?
Yes, please you probably have someone you love a spouse a child a sister a brother, okay?
Yeah, and what we what a lot of this is common sense
So how much value is your relationship with that person?
How much would you put a price on taking a walk and being pain free?
How much would a price would you put on being able to enjoy an activity, whether it be stamp collecting, fishing?
I mean, these are things there's not a mathematical formula.
You
Yeah, there's not a mathematical formula, Brian.
It's a common sense.
life experiences.
That's why, as you said, numerous times, Chris, you are right.
You need an experienced attorney to handle that for you, because we all know that those are valid things, but I would be like, I don't know how much I'd put on a...
you know, a walk I would want.
Yeah, obviously I want to do that for I want to be pain free.
So it's you got to have the right person with the right experience.
Maybe they go to McGillis calm.
That's m a c g i l l i s McGillis calm to to talk to you because you you know what's going on you have the track record of winning Chris McGillis is the founder and partner of McGillis law group.
They help this worker
win a 5.5 million judgment against minards for violating safety rules.
Maybe he can help you.
Chris, we appreciate your time this morning.
Thanks a lot for all the advice.
Hey Brian, thank you so much.
I appreciate you.
Good
8-5-5-7-5 Civic is how you get ahold of us.
I'm wondering how long your commute is and if gas prices are making you start to consider
changing your job.
Now, that's a drastic step.
We all know how much is costing us to get gas.
I was thinking the other day, my former job, I used to drive from the north side of Chicago to Milwaukee every day.
I was filling up a couple times a week.
So at that point, I was spending maybe $120 a week on gas, I would now be spending almost $200 a week on gas, I would not
continue working in that at that level that just it's untenable and I was reading this story about a lot of people who are starting to make that choice because we are feeling the pain from these gas prices there's no doubt the average gas gallon of gas 452 across the nation yesterday up from 298 when the conflict began in late February the conflict there the news trying to
Whitewash the war it is a war of choice.
So now we're paying all this money Parker your commutes pretty short.
What did?
What'd you say like 15 minutes 15 20?
Yeah 20 minutes 20 minutes.
That's okay.
That's it's still commute But you're using if you added let's say you had to add another 40 minutes that commute Let's say you lived an hour from work.
I try.
I would love to.
I would love to somehow clone myself.
That would be a nightmare for all involved.
Yes, it would.
But think of more of me.
All over the state.
I mean, every corner of Wisconsin is me.
And it'd be like multiplicity, the movie with Michael Keaton, where each clone got progressively dumber.
And some of you I know are thinking, how there's no way that could happen.
But trust me, trust me, I could get dumber.
I'm trying not to, but I probably could.
So workers with long commutes are being hit by this thing.
A larger share of job seekers, and I know my wife is one, are looking for fully remote jobs.
That's a big change.
But we all know most jobs you can't do fully remote.
You have to be there to do your job.
And if you're looking to change, this is a bad time to be looking to change.
careers or change jobs because despite what we're hearing from the administration, jobs, at least if you're trying to even make a lateral move, jobs are tough to find.
It's very hard.
So that's why a lot might be saying, oh, I want to move to a different job that's closer to me, but I can't.
So more and more workers are looking for a job within a 30 mile radius.
That's a that's according to indeed the job search website That rose to fifty nine point two percent in April.
It was up from fifty seven point eight percent in February It's a small increase, but who doesn't want to live?
Closer to where they work just to cut down on on even let's take gas out of it even just for a commute time Do you want to be sitting in traffic and if you if you?
live or work around Milwaukee or Madison here it is
It's insane.
You don't want to be driving forever to get to work because now you've taken your eight hour day.
You've expanded it to 10.
Some people 11, maybe a little more.
They were used to when I lived in California because of housing costs being so high.
There was a saying you drive till you can afford it.
So you would drive out to find where you could buy a house.
But that meant you were sitting in traffic.
Some people were in traffic up to two hours each way.
Trying to get to work just so they could have a house.
That's no that's no way to live your life So in more employees are working from home.
That's up to a 26% in March and April compared to 24% in January a Lot of companies though one can't and two won't go fully remote.
So we're gonna have to keep dealing with it I'm I would love to hear from you if you're if you're in this position and you're saying Brian, I just I can't
I've I've started looking for a job.
I have to get closer to home because if you're like me, one of the biggest veins of my existence is sitting in traffic.
And especially after a long day of work, you do not want to be sitting in traffic.
And that's why people, you know, it used to be sometimes after work, you'd sit stand around, maybe you'd have a
chat with your co-worker or whatever.
Now people are bolting for their cars because they're like we've got to get so far and it takes me a long time and I got to sit in traffic and I'm going to have a heart attack just yelling at people because they're all stupid and that's you know that's how every commute is.
All right, we are saying goodbye to our friends at WMDX.
You're going to listen to Stephanie Miller, but you can always follow us on the Civic Media app, and you can download that and listen to the show.
And if you missed the final hour, be sure you go to Spotify, subscribe, and then you can always listen to the third hour of this show whenever you want while you're still enjoying Stephanie Miller.
For everybody else on the network, sit tight.
We'll be back with stuff you need to know.
It's Daybreak on the Civic Media Network.
kids
I'm like, why is he still playing this bad instrumental of on the road again?
Yeah, no, it's because well listen.
No, you shouldn't be sorry.
It's me.
I I hate the clock Hey, let me take these few seconds to remind you to go to our new Instagram and Facebook pages a daybreak with Brian and Jamie so that you can follow us and maybe you can teach me to tell time on the civic media The
but it can be hard to find news about your local community.
Civic Media is dedicated to providing quality local and state news coverage across Wisconsin.
With the Civic Media app, you can get notifications about local stories that matter to you and your community.
Find the free Civic Media app in your phone's app store and choose notifications from the menu to tell us what kind of news you want to hear about.