
Ah, he found the kink of the plan here?
Let's take the call first.
Let's take the call.
All right.
Well, it's pretty important.
It's kind of upsetting that, well, this was on Tom Harmon's show and reported by Phil Lidner that Musk is helping Russia.
bomb Ukraine and the thing is that Musk is using Starlink and we have to call our reps to have them shut down Starlink because Russia keeps killing the civilians this way every week he's killing civilians children
Yeah.
Well, excuse me.
You can ask Jim if we can, uh, charge, uh, Elon Musk with the espionage act of 1917.
There you go.
Aiding the, aiding the enemy is treasonous and can lead to prison and execution.
It's called the espionage act of 1917.
But I'm asking the representatives to call to get Musk to shut down the Starlink system because this helps Russia kill more children and they knocked out the power and The power has been out for two weeks even Phil Lidner's living over there.
He's a report great reporter.
Yes, and he said he said even that Musk shut down Starlink for Ukraine
Because way back they said if you don't assign the mineral deal We're gonna shut down Starlink.
So what's going on with this Elon Musk?
Yeah,
you know what I'm just saying is we got to get this Starlink should be shut down because he's aiding the enemy and I'm saying you should be charged with the violating the espionage act of 1917 Well, that's all you want to say.
Thank you for getting it on.
Yeah
I know
I
We know that's no
back
Go
Winter go-go.
You never would have predicted that.
Why are we playing this?
Well, because we want to get you out of this winter weather and into someplace nice and warm, like Chula Vista, with an overnight stay for you and a bunch of friends.
They have included six water park passes with this.
It's an overnight stay.
And you could be the winner.
And we're going to give that away here in just a moment, but we just have one condition you can give us a call.
and tell us a good news story, okay?
That's the deal, 855-752-4842.
Tell us something good that happened to you or that you witnessed or maybe somebody in your family helped somebody out.
You can call us right now, 855-752-4842.
It's an overnight stay at Chula Vista Resort in Wisconsin Dells and we'll take your calls now, all right?
All right.
Oh, they're
Hello.
life?
Well, the good news story was at Christmas time.
I'm retired and so I'm living just off of Social Security, which isn't a whole lot.
And so I was only going to be able to buy for the kids this year my nieces and nephews and grandnieces and nephews instead of my sisters and the grown nieces.
But anyway, I happened to join this Walmart thing and they flashed up like a week before Christmas or two weeks before Christmas some incredible bargains like $200 items for $12.
And so I was able to get a gift for everybody this year, and that's the most wonderful thing for me for Christmas is a gift.
Live it up like a billionaire.
There you go.
Congratulations.
All right.
You have to be a billionaire to enjoy yourself.
Very good.
All right.
I wanted to kind of get to a little bit of the massive investment in AI.
Okay, I have this little cartoon here and I wanted to mention.
A cartoon.
Yes, it's a cartoon.
Like, one side says this, the other side says that.
Okay.
It
And on the other side are the CEOs.
And what do we want?
And they say AI.
And the guy goes, AI to do what?
And they shout, we don't know.
And the other guy says, well, all right.
What do we want it for?
Well.
We don't know.
Anyway, that's the cartoon I interrupted this whole program
There's so much criticism for AI and these data plants, and it really is something that just came out of nowhere for me and
pretty much up
on technology.
I want to get to this.
This is something that happened in Wisconsin a little while ago, but there was a really nice or a great story, not exactly a great story.
It's a horror story from a Wisconsin role woman who told the story to former transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg at a town hall in La Crosse.
Remember he was up there?
Yep.
Talked to a lot of people up there, but I thought this story stood out for me and
Of course, now we,
go.
I'm going to build on that.
So my husband and I are here from a little rural village, about 30 families.
There are no rapists or murderers in our families, but ICE is there.
For the last seven days we are exhausted Because we got a call on Friday night that a babysitter in the local mobile home park Had a two-month-old baby that hadn't picked up been picked up for three days The next night in the middle of the night we got a call that the tomato farm an hour that way ice had trapped
people on top of the roof for seven hours.
Do you all remember how cold it was a couple nights ago?
Seven hours, but we were already like our little group that was mobilized in this little town.
We were already dealing with things and we didn't have anybody else.
Can you help convince everybody that we have to organize locally?
Very, very fast.
He was on with Jen Psaki last night on MSNOW.
pretty much talking about the situation in Minneapolis and everything else going on in the country.
But I'm gonna get some sound from that show, perhaps from last night, because he was really getting into the weeds about looking beyond what we're going through right now.
And what are we gonna do?
Because eventually, you know, this term of office and this administration is gonna either pay the price for it or we're gonna pay the price for it.
That's right.
Being under control.
by it almost all the time.
brown might have just sent his most arranged fundraising email to date with this latest email Where he threatens to send ice after supporters unless they give him money and prove their citizenship No, I'm not kidding the email reads I reached out last week about my citizens only survey Your file says you're a top mag a patriot but my records to my survey still say response pending Don't tell me you're an illegal alien that cannot be true.
This is your final moment to prove me wrong.
Please please
Are you a proud American citizen or does ICE need to come and track you down?
Take Citizens Only Survey.
Let's be clear, both Republicans and Democrats are guilty of sending aggressive fundraising emails and texts, but Trump literally threatening to send ICE after American citizens to try to get money out of them.
When we've seen two American citizens die in recent weeks as a result of ICE operations,
is particularly insane.
They want us to stop comparing ICE to a modern day Gestapo.
Yet this email is basically Trump saying, give me your money or else I'll send my Gestapo to personally take you in.
exactly where
doubt
Let's
Yeah, well I texted you you know I twist on the song when you guys said top of the world I mean if you said not a call in the sky The line from top of the world and I kind of texted you a twist on that that
even
do
Yeah, that's not quite what I did, but it Trump I mean Trump would kick dogs because he doesn't like dogs anyway and right and Mark can
right.
Stay on the front.
All right, not a problem, brother
Oh, yeah.
The lyrics to the song, and some songs, they can just turn them around and kind of twist the lyrics around a little bit.
It is just a pretty horrific and one thing that's kind of confused me being cleared up now They say that Alex pretty you know damaged that that ice vehicle But was that before after they tackled him?
That day because if it was if he kicked that vehicle before they you know Why wasn't he arrested because I saw the TL assembly come off and you know that's something you thought he would get arrested for but I'm wondering if that happened after they had tackled him and cracked his rib and he was
Annoyed about that.
Is that the reason he was not arrested for obviously damaging their vehicle?
I mean that I'm right unclear on on the timeline there and that Yeah, and that's something that I'm just wondering if if they did not arrest him then because They obviously initiated an assault on him and they didn't want to admit to that but then a week later Rolls-byes if they gave gives them an opportunity to to execute justice in their eyes and of course it was
Cold-blooded murder.
I mean one way the other was cold-blooded murder and right Yeah, the shooting of Renee good.
It was cold-blooded murder and it is just We're gonna hear nothing about why is from the Trump administration and but It is pretty pretty sad,
I saw that video as well the one that was shot about a week before Before the second video
where he was killed.
And I wondered the same thing.
Did he get into the tussle with those guys?
And any of those ice agents, the same ice agents that were involved in the second incident when he got killed?
It's
But I just wonder why he wasn't arrested.
Right, I
you're
masks
video it was cute however the team of punishers we got your address we know who you are watch your mouth you hear me commies stand down we're broken your signal groups we've hacked your sites
Wipe your paws off.
This information comes with consequences.
All right.
Now we
Yeah, absolutely.
Yeah, we're going to definitely get to that with Jim Santel in just a few moments because we want to find out what's legal, what isn't.
Right.
Letting people know that ICE is in town or where they're staying or what's going on.
I don't see anything wrong with it.
It sounds like free speech to me.
And whether you signal or a telephone call or whatever
Do all the moms and dads out there are watching right now?
They should sign up now right for Trump accounts during this tax season
We've already had just in the past few days 500,000 families sign up.
We believe they're about 25 million who are eligible So go on the the IRS website.
It's form 45 47 and every everyone should do it and it's a it's a great way because you can also if relatives rather than giving a toy
for a birthday,
for a
holiday, they can contribute to these accounts.
I think we're going to see a substantial drop in people playing the lottery because you've won the lottery.
You've got $1,000 and the power of compound interest families can add to that.
So this is really a new kind of philanthropy.
It is direct to children.
Yeah, it could work out and you go to the IRS site form 4547 check it out and see if it applies to you if it works for you I have a response for cam that cut I just played about the Punishers out there, you know finding people I didn't say they were eyes, okay?
Okay, it's a nut job as you suggested in your text, right?
We talked about the Trump accounts for newborns Form 45 47 and said and somebody pointed out I was gonna say something about it forgot all about it, but yes skip the toys for next Christmas You know, that doesn't really work I mean you can do that behind the scenes as an adult putting money in the account the kids not gonna know that or even care Give them a toy
I'll tell you, that's got, he's really not a warm person at all.
Amicus a law review and you can hear amicus a law review on the weekends between 9 and 11 o'clock a fantastic program live program You can always give them a call and ask your questions as well We're gonna get into something here that I thought was pretty interesting or and we're asking a lot of questions about this now some people that have been using the the software signal
have their signal chats eavesdropped on, and now they're being threatened by the people who support ICE.
and they're threatening them with arrest and obstruction of the ICE agents.
Yeah, apparently this
So I thought this would be a great way to kind of find out what's legal, what isn't in regards to your ability of free speech and letting your fellow community members know when ICE is in town.
Jim, what's the story?
I sent you the story.
basically from that.
But I also have some audio I could play in just a few moments.
But what do you got?
What do you think?
Sure.
To speech, right?
To petition your government for redress of grievances, right?
Advocacy, assemble, protest, all those kinds of things.
It is not an unqualified right, as we have talked on this broadcast many, many times.
There are all kinds of limitations to it.
Government cannot limit your content unless it is in certain areas that are, for example, inciting violence, that sort of thing.
But the answer, generally, to these kinds of things, you get the same question also about even
law enforcement, using your phones, all those kinds of things.
People are asking lots of these questions.
And the answer is, again, you can use these mechanisms.
You can use your phone to record visually what is going on.
There's nothing unconstitutional about that, nothing illegal about that.
And if you're communicating, again, as it appears that folks are around the country, including the right Minneapolis on signal,
You have a right to do that.
You can communicate with other people, including describing where events are taking place, where you're seeing movements.
That kind of communication is protected by the First Amendment.
with a limitation once again, and that is if during the course of that communication, just like on the telephone, if other communications of various kinds, if I'm inciting violence, if I'm promoting some end that would threaten the safety and security of people, then you've crossed over, right?
And that's basically, we think about what Donald Trump did on January 6th, whether or not, you know, he was inciting violence on that day, that you cannot do.
But generally, again, under the constitution,
you've got a right to not only to observe, but record and talk to other people about what you're seeing and what you're doing.
Nothing wrong with that.
It is concerning, of course, that we've got the director of the FBI saying he's opened an investigation into the chance.
Well, again, if there's something illegal that is being promoted, that's one thing.
If you're simply trying to inhibit communication, that's quite another.
And his investigation in
that area if that's the focus of it intimidation.
is simply unfounded.
Well, there's a lot of intimidation in regards to this because the right wing is responding to this.
This is one of their responses.
Unhinged leftists claim an independent journalist infiltrated signal chats used to track ICE agents and disrupt their operations, urging people to harass and start changing their usernames and so on and so forth.
Let's listen to this particular cut.
All right.
Hey
guys, so the signal group chats in Minnesota have been compromised, but fortunately they posted this from their own account with their name so we can all see who they are and
Yeah, I'm getting some some attention some love.
So this is who's infiltrated those chats and they're saying that they will release all the names They safe out there also change your number like periodically disappearing messages every 24 hours Don't leave a trail and make sure you're changing your username and your number all the time Also burner phones are
If you want to have some confidence, nothing wrong with this, that what you're doing, just like a telephone call, the signal obviously much more sophisticated as reported or indicated, it comes and goes, you can limit it, all sorts of things.
But if you want to be certain that your communication is getting to where it's got to go, then do those things.
Sure, to make sure that those conduits are protected and you want to be safe and secure as well.
And if there is a concern about that, sure, then make that.
It's a very practical thing.
The upshot is...
you can communicate, do those things that you want to do.
You don't have to do them.
Obviously, no one compels you to speak.
No one compels you to communicate.
But once you do, if you want to do that in a safe and secure mechanism, use those aspects of signal that permits you to do that.
If that means changing your identity and your contact information, you can go ahead and do that without any problem.
But again, the entire issue really devolves.
and I use that word purposely into what's going on here.
It is pure communication and is our government once again threatening.
attempting to chill even the communications there.
Is that what these messages are all about?
And the threats, of course, in the opposite direction.
Also, we run out of adjectives.
It's not just warranted.
Threats themselves can be illegal.
And all of that, again, as we've said repeatedly, no place in an area of free communication.
We can have differences of opinion.
We don't threaten each other and we don't induce violence.
ahead.
Yes, good afternoon.
I would say, as a citizen, I'm not that concerned that Alex Pretty was photographed or videotaped, literally trashing the ice machine, so to speak.
It brings to mind
what Jesus did in the temple, trashing the temple and to get rid of the money changes and the corruption.
Alex was literally acting in a righteous manner, and his life was led in a righteous way.
That's
have
All right.
Thank you, Ben.
I appreciate that.
You know, Jim, here's the thing, and this I think goes to the administration.
They have something called
NSPM 7.
And what it is is an edict by the administration to try and find organizations that are left-wing against the current government.
Calling them terrorists and and insurrectionists.
That's what they're trying to do and that's what I'm seeing in this signal chat Intimidation that we're seeing from the right wing Infiltrating their chat.
Of course, they've they've deleted the chat already I don't know if that you can save that information or not But they've deleted the chat and they're gonna have a new way of doing it I guess but the thing is
They could be investigated by the federal government in regards to this, and be called a terrorist organization.
This is going back to the current president's campaign promise, retribution, right?
And we see it here.
plainly, an attempt to intimidate once again.
We see it with respect to his prosecutions of his political foes, including arguably the folks who were there in Minneapolis appropriately in their discretion fighting back about this.
I don't mean that physically.
I mean that in terms of protest and doing those other First Amendment things.
Here's the point.
You don't need a memorandum inside the Department of Justice.
It's the commission of the Department of Justice and of other law enforcement agencies
to investigate crime.
And so if you've got some reasonable suspicion, you have to have more than just, you can't just dislike somebody.
If I've got some, even a small scintilla to indicate that there's criminal activity, yes, I can open up a criminal investigation.
If I've got reasonable, there's criminal conduct.
Criminal conduct does not include communication, even about unpopular things, even about things that are critical of the government.
First amendment, long stated by the Supreme Court, other courts saying we tolerate
diversity of views, we tolerate people saying things we don't like that may offend you, may offend me.
That's what the First Amendment is about.
What we don't do is we don't tolerate speech that advocates for violence.
That's where the line is drawn.
And again, I'm stricken by the fact that for some reason this administration thinks this needs to issue memory.
It tells us what they're doing, also plainly meant to intimidate to let you know, listen, we're looking at you and that's the purpose of it.
But the fact that they're issuing it at all underscores that that's the purpose of it.
Because if they really had a criminal purpose and really identified some criminal activity, someone inciting the overthrow of the government, someone inciting violence, then you simply open the file and you pursue it as you normally do.
You don't need a directive.
You don't need an executive order.
You don't need a memorandum telling law enforcement to do its job.
All of that, of course, in a time of normalcy.
This is not that time.
We are in a different time in America, and the rules in many ways no longer apply.
And then, of course, talking about it, and how do we get rid of these people?
How do we vote them out?
What can we do to oppose them?
And that would be taking down the government, essentially, to them.
It would be an insurrection for them, right?
Thomas Jefferson did
Others, and advocating to vote in 10 months from now for people who would change the Congress, advocating in three years from now for a presidential candidate, all those kinds of things.
That's not insurrection.
That's advocacy.
for a change in the way that my government, our government, your government is operating.
I can advocate for issues in the public domain.
I can do it privately.
All of that is protected, and none of it should be intimidated or inhibited by conduct that suggests that, gee, if you say those things, if you appear, if you talk these ways, we're going to open up a file on you.
And that, again, I've often said this, it's the investigation, which is the punishment.
There is no criminal lawsuit there.
There is no viable civil lawsuit.
Here's a lot of people.
Yeah,
We scare a lot of people.
And that's what this administration has done with everyone from Leticia James and James Comey to Jay Powell, to people on the streets of Minneapolis, sending the message, you better be looking over your shoulder.
That's not what government is all about.
They should be doing just the opposite.
I look to a civil rights division these days inside the Department of Justice, which should be promoting these things, including investigating both of these horrific deaths in Minnesota.
That should be in the
the ambit right now of the Civil Rights Division, and yet they're not doing that.
And instead, going in just the opposite direction, lots of very, very head turned upside down situations here.
That's the
first thing that jumps out to me, which is again, but we need to talk again regrettably or maybe positively about the basis for a search warrant.
Some magistrate judge presumably in
Atlanta, some play in Georgia, we'll get back to that in just a moment or so, has found probable cause to believe that there is some evidence of crime there.
Okay, we've got a five year statute of limitations with respect to 2020, which suggests to me that if the magistrate judge is right, there's something new.
something new in those records.
Is there?
We don't know.
We don't know what this is all about.
It is interesting to note as well that the case is being handled not by the U.S.
Attorney there in the district in Georgia, but by another designee of the Attorney General who happens to be Thomas Albus.
He's going to U.S.
Attorney in Missouri, in eastern Missouri.
So
he
petitions for this, goes to a magistrate judge presumably in Georgia, gets this warrant, and the concerns also, we've seen this before, are okay.
Judicial authorization take these things that all this is under seal yet That's why we don't have a lot of answers to this but a huge amount of concern by the state election officials about the chain of custody and legitimacy of those documents come in you sees all this
from
now
it's no longer in the custody of those people who are responsible for keeping it that way, comes into the FBI.
I've no doubt they'll run into federal court here and seek an order that compels the FBI to maintain things as they are.
But once they're no longer in the chain of custody there, in Georgia,
You know, what happens to those documents?
I didn't use to speak about the idea this way, but that's the concern.
What happens now?
The people who have the legitimate ownership of them no longer have them for what purpose to what end?
And why is the director of national intelligence there?
What is that about?
right picked up the phone and this is where this comes from again so and again repeatedly and just to be clear again for all your listeners George has been the subject of by my count at least two if not three accounts including hand counts the ballots were clear that that the current president did not win in 2020 and the Joe Biden did
Are we just going back to try to revisit that again?
And if it is, it's an abuse of the law enforcement process in terms of securing a search warrant.
There's got to be something current.
It's got to be evidence of a crime of some kind.
60 judges around the country found that the votes were not stolen.
What is this about and what are we doing now?
We will presumably get some answers at some point coming up.
that's the reason for your doing this to intimidate something in the future, that's not a legitimate law enforcement purpose inside the Department of Justice or anyplace else.
Again, I'll be fascinated to see the affidavit in support of probable cause to believe that there is a current, viable, recent federal crime that will be revealed in those records from 2020.
what does that look like and what is the basis for it?
Magistrate Judge said yes, gave authorization, but again, the standard's fairly low and that's probable cause and this is far from over.
Again, we don't know much about this other than to say lots of questions.
and
All right, I was going to say that the machines are owned by a right winger now in all of these different states.
So, you know, it's it's something where it could be like this is the distraction.
We're going to change the machines.
We're going to gear them for 2026 and you won't be looking.
You won't be, you know, noticing anything different.
But in fact, while we are distracted by 2020, they're doing something for 2026.
Yes, at least then.
And
voting
And
And that's simply not true.
And again, I shame on our government to the extent that they're doing this here other places for sending the messages that once again suggests to people my vote doesn't count because it will be will be disregarded or discarded entirely.
No, just the opposite.
You need to vote and you need to ensure that that representative government continues in America.
Civic Media is dedicated to providing quality local and state news coverage across Wisconsin.
With the Civic Media app, you can get notifications about local stories that matter to you and your community.
Find the free Civic Media app in your phone's app store and choose notifications from the menu to tell us what kind of news you want to hear about.