Thank you so much for tuning in.
Thank you for listening.
You can also be a big part.
Love it when you join us 8 5 5 7 5 2 4 8 4 2 8 5 5 7 5 Civic got just be us working hard on the board and our pal Earl Ingram from the Earl Ingram show can hear his fine program Monday through Friday 8 to 10 a.m.
We're in the civic media radio network Earl Thank you for sticking around and don't forget folks the last segment of the day tell us something good gotta end the show
with a smile on our face.
Aw, Jess.
You got it.
You got it.
You got it.
We talk about some heavy things.
Sometimes we like to end it with a little cherry on top.
So tell us something good in the last hour, in the last segment, my bad, in the last segment.
In the last hour, we were discussing primarily the Wisconsin Supreme Court race, Susan Crawford going up against the...
guy who's dumb as a sack of hammers, Brad Schimmel, and some of our audience wanted to continue that conversation.
And we will shortly here, we'll take your calls and your texts as well.
And then we have to get to some of the news of the day.
Of course, there's an executive order being signed by President Trump with an attempt to eliminate the Department of Education.
We're going to go there as well.
Plus, the Dem Party, the resistance, the leadership, where are we at?
Who's doing what?
I did see
on the Kyron here, MSNBC, Bernie Sanders and AOC launched a fight in the oligarchy tour.
Well, they're out doing something.
Should more be done.
And by whom I get your thoughts on that as well, eight, five, five, seven, five, two, four, eight, four, two.
But let's wrap up the conversation on just judge Susan Crawford versus Brad Shimmel.
Chris from SunPur, you are patient.
Thank you so much.
Let us know what your thoughts are, Chris.
Welcome.
Hi, Dom.
Hi, Earl.
Well, something good.
I was coming home from the labor temple where I was doing phone calls for Susan Crawford
out the vote.
And what I wanted to say was when I tuned in on the radio, I heard a lot of the other guys' names.
And I really want to encourage people to use the name Susan Crawford as often as they can because the name Susan Crawford is not getting out there enough.
We need people to know that name when they go into the voting booth.
We need them to remember Susan Crawford, not the other guy.
And we need to remember that Susan Crawford will look at the legislature's legislation and make sure that it meets constitutional muster.
We're not looking at somebody who's a rubber stamp for the Republican Party.
And I think that that's the huge difference between her and the other guy.
And I really, really wish people would stop talking about the other guy because I see the other guy's name all over everything.
And I think we have to stop promoting him.
And I think we need to
Now, when Susan Crawford starts saying dumbass things all the time, I'll play much more of Susan Crawford.
But the fact that I'm saying Brad Schimel's name is not an endorsement or an acknowledgement of his superior intellect.
The guys are moron.
And he can't keep his mouth shut.
He says terrible things.
And I want to remind people over and over again that that's who that guy is.
So while I get what you're saying, and I'd love to play some more Susan Crawford.
And as soon as I get some of that sound of her, you know, calling Republicans on the Wisconsin Supreme Court names, or as soon as I hear her about, you know, spending thousands and thousands of dollars of money on stupid coins called kicking ass every day, you know, those kinds of things.
When I get clips of her,
talking about buying knee pads begging for money from people, I'd be happy to do that.
But right now, I'm playing those clips because I'm being very critical of that guy.
Well, maybe that's what you're doing, but I'm talking about campaigns.
If somebody's campaigning something or if they're wanting to sell something, what you need is name recognition.
Name recognition is what's going to get Susan Crawford elected.
And I don't think I'm seeing enough name recognition from the campaigns.
The campaigns put the other guys' name out as much as they put out Susan Crawford's name.
Every time you put out a piece of campaign literature with your competition's name on it, you're negating the dollars that you're spending on your
Well, I'm talking about the people that are trying to support Susan Crawford should not be putting out the name of the other guy.
I think that it's a very stupid way to spend your dollars.
I think that to spend your dollars for your candidate, you should put your candidate's name out.
We had this, we had Dr., we had Professor Lakeoff come at one of our grassroots festivals and he told us that what we did in the Walker campaign was we raised Scott Walker to the national level.
We made this guy a national level celebrity by putting his name on it for everything.
And I'm just questioning the people of Wisconsin about how they're utilizing the names of other candidates and they're raising them.
And I really don't care about the dollars that are spent on anybody's shows.
I'm sorry, Dom.
I know that you have to think about that.
It's not something I think about.
Thank you.
I get your point.
I do.
And certainly those that are supportive should be promoting their candidate and perhaps more promotion of their candidate and less tearing down of the opponent.
Yeah, I mean, I get that point.
From the dollars being spent, no, that is not something that crosses Dominic's mind whatsoever.
I know that used to be a thing for some folks, not me.
I'll let the folks who are in charge of that worry about that and I'll worry about me and how I'm going to present these different candidates.
And again, I'm obviously being very critical of Shimmel.
I hear what you're saying, and there's only going to be two of them on the ballot, man.
And I would also suggest that people are really not knowing who they're going to vote for.
And they hear constant bad things about Brad Schimmel, because it's true.
You know what I mean?
They'll be like, oh, I'm not voting for that guy.
I'm voting for the other person.
So thank you for the call, Chris.
Always appreciate it.
I know you are a true believer, and you actually get out there and do the work.
And we certainly appreciate you doing so and providing your opinion today.
Earl, what are your thoughts, ma'am?
I mean, you know, if, if, if, if I have to be concerned when I, when I'm doing the show and, and I'm, and I'm talking about, you know, who, who Brad Shimmel is, I don't think the fact that I'm mentioning his name.
I'm gonna influence somebody who's looking to vote for the other person.
Clearly, hey man, people know who Brad Shimmel is.
All you have to do is watch the part of the $100 million of commercials that you get to see, you know what I mean?
Every, just nonstop, sometimes repeatedly.
People know the names, right?
And if they don't know the names,
that they were hopefully, uh, misinformed.
And by now, Dominic, we're talking a couple of weeks before, you know, I don't, I don't think, and I understand.
I know Chris, I know her well, her and her husband work really hard.
They really are people who labor and believe in it.
And, and man, they're great fighters.
So.
I'm not going to say anything negative about it.
I just wanted to say that on the news, when they played the news, there was a voice of Donald Trump saying how he was signing the papers to disassemble the Department of Education.
And he was thereby sending that responsibility back to the state.
He wants to send the responsibility back to the states and the whole time who's here Elon Musk trying to buy the favor of the states.
It's a lose-lose situation.
Either way, you go,
I'm glad my kids are through the school system right now.
And sending it to the states.
And I guess we should get to that topic, Earl.
the, this executive order by Donald Trump to dismantle or somehow take, you know, do away with the department of education.
AP has a little bit of story on, a little bit on this.
The White House said that the education secretary, Linda McMahon, it's hard to take her seriously.
I mean, we'll be directed to facilitate the department's closure while quote, continuing to ensure the effective and uninterrupted delivery of services, programs and benefits on which Americans rely.
Well, it's easy to write that down, Earl.
But if he acts half of your department, you gotta assume there's gonna be some interruption of delivery of services programs and benefit.
You can't tell me half of the people were doing nothing and there will be no impact.
And it doesn't take, you don't have to think too hard.
to understand the whole purpose for it is to dismantle public education and to again give an upper hand to private education and you know it really is heartbreaking because I've always said and I'll say once I said a thousand times I'm supporting where the majority of the children are Dominic they're in public education I'm not opposed to private education and those kinds of things
but it would be foolish to dismantle public education where the majority of the American children are and who are going to grow up to be adults and run the nation.
Why would you, why would you destroy that man?
Tell me, tell me how that makes some sense, Dominic.
the private education sector.
Here's the thing, man, I went to a private high school, a public grade school up through eighth grade, went to a private high school.
I also have no problem with private high school education, but you pay for it.
You want it?
Pay for it.
Like my parents paid for it.
They made the sacrifices to do that.
They made that determination.
Now these public schools, in doing so, if you take away money and put it away from public into private,
Is there a downside?
Is it like firing half the staff at a department thinking you're going to get the same services?
Of course there's an impact to that.
Of course there is.
And I don't want, I don't want, you know, my tax scholars going to, let's call it indoctrination of young children to religious ideologies like saying, I don't know, the earth is 6,000 years old.
So no, I got a big problem with that, man.
We've got two, we have the program here in the state of Wisconsin, man, unfunded mandate.
How many hundreds of millions of dollars are being spent?
So yeah, I get, and if that's how it's going to be, then how important, if all this comes to this date, how important is this next election of Dr. Jill Underly for Wisconsin's DPI?
You know what I'm saying?
How important is it to have Governor Evers as our governor or a Democratic governor going forward?
If all of a sudden the states are going to direct all this money, oh my God.
You imagine if we had Scott Walker back as governor, where would he direct that money to?
We got a guy like Speaker Mike Johnson who religiously believes apparently the earth is 6,000 years old.
Good luck.
Welcome to the indoctrination.
Welcome to the churn.
Come back with us.
855-752-4842.
More your calls.
Welcome back to the Dom Salvia Show 855-7-5.
Pardon me.
855-752-484-2855-757.
I got just PS on the board.
Earl Ingram from the Earl Ingram show joining me today till 6 o'clock.
You can check his show out 8 to 10 a.m.
Monday through Friday.
Department of Education.
I guess they're getting rid of
it.
We
What is the what does the Department of Education do?
Would you what would you say you do here?
Here's what the AP a couple of brief highlights from the AP so apparently the Department of Education
Manages approximately $1.5 trillion in student loan debt for over 40 million.
Bower, Bower, Borrowers, easy for me to say, it also oversees the Pell Grant, which provides aids to student below a certain income threshold.
Oh, I can see why they want to get rid of that.
What else does the Department of Education do?
Oh, here's another thing that other civil rights really don't like, civil rights enforcement.
Through its
Office for Civil
Rights, the Education Department conducts investigations in issues guidance on how civil rights law should be applied, such as for LGBTQ plus students and students of color.
The office also oversees a large data collection project that tracks disparities in resources
Of course, access and discipline for students of different racial and socioeconomic groups.
Oh, can't have that.
If you find out that the
black kids are getting
punished more harshly than the white kids, or the disabled kids are getting punished more harshly than the white kids, well, that'd be bad for us.
So let's get rid of that, right?
What's the problem there?
You got a problem tracking those things?
Come on, people, college accredited.
Education while the education department does not directly accredit colleges and universities that oversees the system by reviewing all federally recognized accrediting agencies Institutions of higher education must be accredited to gain access to the federal money for student financial aid.
Oh, what was that?
What was that one university?
That was the total scam and they got they got fined.
Oh, yeah, Trump University Yeah, that one I remembered that the guy that's in the White House right now
Thank you, MEGA.
Money for Schools.
A bunch of the Education Department's Money for K through 12 schools goes through large federal programs such as Title I for Low Income Schools and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Those programs support services for students with disabilities, lower class sizes with additional teaching positions, and pay for social work and other non-teaching roles in school.
Now, Trump has called for shifting those programs to the state project 2025.
So they should put it to HHS.
Anyway, there's some of the item, some of the responsibilities of the Department of Education, obviously lots of money there.
What is the point?
Why are we doing this?
Oh, yeah, tax breaks for the wealthy, but let's take some more calls 855.
Yes, go
Education, you know, kind of forming shouldn't we have that?
I mean, I think we should I think those children that are gonna be indoctrinated and bent into some of those lines of things that does them a disservice because when you get older and all of a sudden you realize that maybe maybe maybe you question some of that faith that was what that was poured into you again, you know as part of the culture you get that You know, how does that max?
How does a 6,000 year old earth match with the science?
You know the scientific
You use a verbiage.
You use some verbiage.
Faith.
You didn't say facts.
Wait, don't get me started.
Okay.
So what your faith is, is your faith.
Right on.
And you have a right to that.
You don't have a right to force it on me.
I mean, I don't care who I...
Disappoint in that frame of reference, but it's just factual, man.
Your faith and your beliefs are yours, and that's where it lies.
Just don't force them on me.
If you're going to force them on children, you do a disservice.
to what this nation supposedly stands for.
And if you want
Hey, Dom.
You know, one of the things I keep thinking about is every time I hear you talk about this,
the ability of parents to take their public school funds and send them to private
I think the amount of money any parent should be able to divert to a private school should be limited to no more than the amount that that parent pays in taxes.
If you have one kid, you get to send the whole amount.
You got two kids, you split it between them.
But my tax dollars should not be able to be diverted to go fund
education in these goofball private schools.
Can I, can I take that money and direct it myself,
That'd be nice.
We can't do that in other places.
Why are we doing it there?
Come back with us.
Eight, five, five, seven, five, two, four, eight, four, two, more of your calls.
Plus we're the Dems at yo, come back with us.
Welcome back to the Dom Salvia show eight five five seven five two four eight four two eight five five seven five civic just PS working hard on the board joined it today by co-host Earl Ingram from the Earl Ingram show.
Check him out Monday through Friday right here on the civic media radio network eight to 10 a.m.
Love it when we get to hang out with Earl Taylor.
I'm really good to see you, man.
It's a hard time to get together on the weekend.
So appreciate our time together here, Earl.
We're talking about the
Department
Donald Trump.
Signed an executive order to dismantle a congressional created cabinet I don't I don't quite understand how this whole thing works But apparently you know if you're if you're Donald Trump and you have executive orders you could do anything you want 8 5 5 7 5 2 4 8 4 2 let's get some collars They have been very patient Paul from the interstate be safe out there Paul you are next welcome.
What do you got for us?
Hello, I was
have one question seen that the Department of Education has been dismantled.
Does that include loan payments
I mean, I really would love to pay the bill, but I don't know where to say I don't know where to send it to.
Paul, I highly doubt that would be the case, although I would love it to be the case, especially given the way that this administration has so haphazardly gone after everything.
And then the losing in court cases left and right, because of course, these executive orders don't carry the weight that Donald Trump wants them to.
you know, separation of powers and all that Congress is in charge and the Donald Trump doesn't get to impound the money.
I know they think they can and maybe they'll make that one, that case go to the Supreme Court, but
if, if, if, if Congress allocates the funds and then the executive branch can just put them in their pocket and not spend the funds as, as, as directed by Congress, then Congress really doesn't have the power of the purse.
So, uh, Paul, I wouldn't doubt it given, given how these guys are like, Oh, we're going to get rid of that department.
All of a sudden it goes offline and all of a sudden your auto deducts out of your checking account to pay for your loans.
They're, they just don't work anymore.
I wouldn't be surprised, but I wouldn't bank on it, Paul.
Thanks for playing, man.
8-5-5-7-5-2-4-8-4-2-8-5-5-7-5.
Civic Whisco Paul, you will be next.
Welcome, Paulie.
What do you got for us?
Hey, good afternoon, gentlemen.
Our government's being dismantled for goodness' sakes, and the Republicans say nothing.
I mean, not...
Well,
That's why, man, they're down.
They don't want, come on, you're worried about minorities and disabled kids and, you know, everyone getting equal access to education, education, man.
Let the states decide it.
And you just happen to be one of those minority groups while you're on your own.
And the last thing the Republicans want are a bunch of woke as kids, you know, challenging their authority.
Well, these programs were put together for a reason to make this country better.
And if you dismantle all this like they're hell-bent on doing, if you ever do get a different administration, how are you going to put this all back together again?
Because we're two years away from elections,
least two years away.
Hey, to me, this election coming up April 1st.
for the Supreme Court justices.
That's a big deal.
We'll see what way that goes.
But this is a mess now.
I don't, I don't know, Earl, how are you going to put this back together?
Thank you guys.
It's like Humpty Dumpty, Earl.
I mean, what happens if this continues on?
Do you think it would be, I mean, you can't, if a Democratic president administration comes on or hell, even if, even if Trump loses the Congress,
You know, he's not going to sign anything, right?
So you're not going to get any new laws passed and signed by Trump unless he continues to lose these court cases, which I imagine he will, and I can't imagine that the Supreme Court's going to say, yes, Donald Trump can unilaterally dismantle these departments that Congress created.
And even though he's forced to put some things back,
they aren't what they ever were before he got ahold to them.
So he's put his footprint on these things already and I don't know, I don't know how, even though the justices are voting against him in the long run, he's still done some major damage.
And it's only been two months, man.
Hey man, that's the amazing thing to me, Dominic.
It's only been two months.
And the other part of this is, he's assembled his team.
While we're talking about this stuff, his team is busy, man, doing some real damage.
There is damage being done.
There are changes.
And he does have authority as president.
He can't deny the executive branch.
He has authority with those executive orders to impact some federal employees with that.
No doubt about it.
But there are limitations to it.
And just because you write it down,
and you send it out and you sign it with your big fat Sharpie, doesn't make it true.
It doesn't, man.
You are not a king.
These are not edicts that people must handle or off with their head.
That's not how it works.
I know that's how he wants it to work.
And I know a lot of you Republicans wish it would be that way.
And I would warn you that, yeah, you wish it would be that way because you don't think you're the one who could be losing your head.
But invariably, it comes to that, man.
Sooner or later, you cross the king unless you're the jester.
like me, you're going to lose 8-5-5-7-5-2-4-8-4-2.
How big is the Department of Justice according to time.com?
4,200 employees last September, according to the Office of Personnel Management.
This accounts for 0.2% of overall federal employment last year, the smallest staff of the 15 cabinet agencies.
You knew something was up when, what is her name, McMahon, the person that he appointed to do this job.
And his response, and what he said about her was, she's a great business woman.
Okay, okay, man.
If that's what, is that what we're looking for in all of this, Dominic?
Just great business people.
I mean, no, I'm not me horrible business.
There's some horrible business people.
Donald Trump being one himself.
But but for all those people who have been led to believe that business people would be the best thing, you know, for our government, you see it, man.
People have been clamoring for it for a long time, Dominic.
Many people on the right have been saying the same thing over and over again.
We need to run the government like a business.
No, we don't.
they doing that today?
Hey, you know, I'm just wondering what the cuts to the Department of Education.
I was thinking when I wanted to go to college, my parents said, you want to go to college?
That's great.
But you have to pay your way.
Will the cuts affect like fast and, you know, student loans and stuff like that?
You know what I mean?
I mean, someone, I mean, thank you for the call, Brian.
They're
I think there's like $1.6 trillion of the loans and 40 million.
There's someone's going to have to administer that, right?
So of the people that are still there, perhaps that will still be there.
And you're probably going to still have to make your your loan payments.
And again, this is, you know, I guess a reorganization, not necessarily a cut.
Because again, this money's already been allocated by Congress and the last continuing resolution.
I know Donald Trump doesn't give a damn about Congress's powers.
But, you know, there still is money.
that has to be allotted for and accounted for.
So now, whether that ultimately gets distributed through other agencies, you know, those are kind of workarounds you can do.
So that dollar amount shouldn't, in my opinion, necessarily change.
But certainly the services and the process could totally do that.
Thanks for calling.
Brian, appreciate it.
855-752-4842.
Steve from Milwaukee.
You are next.
Welcome, Steve.
What are your thoughts today?
Hey, I was just
Told that I have to do I have to say something nice I did I did have my last night for leftovers with a Ruben sandwich gotta have that So good so good.
Do you
Yeah
All right.
Oh, yeah.
All right.
Oh, I was just calling to say that it's pretty obvious Trump is a Russian asset.
I mean, this first move was ending USAID and then removing our country from the WHO and, you know, the CDC and all these other agencies, but it's just, it's really, it's really sad.
And it's amazing that there's so many people out there who are cheering the sun.
And not only certainly the, the acts of those things and what is, you know, what's the motivation, right?
Is he a Russian asset?
Well, we've got lots of folks that think that, you know what I mean?
We've had those conversations with friends of ours, Matt Flynn specifically.
He's not shy.
Um, but whether or not he is, or is there, what his motivations are, certainly these actions that this administration are taking are, are more positive for the, the, the Putin.
Regime that it is for NATO for Europe for for us for that matter the USAID the soft power where we're We're just not gonna do that anymore.
So well that gap will get filled by what the Chinese and the Russians eventually I mean that that's not great, but appreciate it Steve Yeah, I'm not a fan of the Trump administration.
Let's put it that way eight five five seven five two four eight four two cam from Appleton you are next welcome.
What do you got for us?
Hey, so with all these I guess
programs and departments and shambles.
I'm being left with the thought that I'm going to make bank, right?
Because all these taxes coming back to me, I'm going to be loaded.
So what I'm doing is filling out these applications.
Oh, hear me out.
I had this buddy of mine named Chris, who had a daughter named Jackie.
um they ended up dying in this horrific accident where they just they they they had something to do with a car and a compactor it was terrible and um what i'm looking to do is get these uh their favorite place to dine was a joint called the peppermint hippo and i'm looking to get their uh these urinal cakes or ashtrays or chairs with uh these engravings on them that say cj this is in a bowl in an old meal
Good afternoon, gentlemen.
Yeah.
I want your expert opinion.
I got my absentee ballot the other day, and I was sailing along pretty good till I got this dog on yes or no question a referendum, and I'd like to have a little opinion of yours of which way I should go on it.
It's about whether that photo ID should be put into the Constitution.
Don, I would say no, no.
Come on, man.
We don't need that in constitution.
Anytime Republicans are offering any amendments regarding amending the constitution about anything, the answer should be no.
Thanks for calling on it.
Empathically.
855-752-4842.
One final segment with me, Earl Ingram, just PS on the board, but.
Talk about what you want to talk about but you got to start out by telling us something good and the day with a smile on our face Join us 855-752-4842
Welcome back to the Dom salvia show.
Join the love train eight five five seven five two four eight four two eight five five seven five civic hour last segment of the day.
If you got something to say hit us up with something good and we'll talk about whatever topics you want to discuss Earl Ingram Jr.
just a PS and you folks on the line.
I'm gonna do it.
I'm gonna do it.
CJ man.
Hey thanks for calling CJ.
I know you got lots
It's 75 degrees in Naples, Florida.
Oh
Hey, thanks for taking my call, Diamond Earl and Earl.
Good to talk to you.
Every once in a while, you take my call.
But I, you know, this is a great thing.
Uh, the department of education is failing our kids.
Read our test scores.
Um, read our test scores for fourth graders and eighth graders.
Well, yeah, but I want him to pay him back.
Unlike the former president who three times went constitutionally to the Supreme Court.
when we're failing them the way you
know whether or not we're failing them or victorious or however you define it it's not about the failure or lack of failure or success CJ it's about whether or not a an executive order signed by your president can eliminate a department created by Congress you're so concerned about Joe Biden's unconstitutional student loan forgiveness
What do you say about your president's unconstitutional executive orders to eliminate the Department of Education?
Just the way Joe Biden went to the Supreme Court and fought for votes and cheating and Not allowing
taxpayers to pay for the student loans this president's gonna go to the Supreme Court and get a judgment on that
And we're failing.
So I want to be clear.
So you, you think I want to be clear.
You think then, I guess we'll move on.
You believe that the executive orders from Donald Trump to eliminate congressional departments is constitutional.
Thank you for that.
Have a great night, CJ.
855-752-4842.
Joy from Green Bay.
You are up.
Tell us something good, Joy.
Welcome.
What do you got?
Well, he took the weather thing, which is pretty cool, but it's still really nice out.
It's not snowing.
Although I like the snow.
So anyway, um, me, I, I disagree.
Well, I don't think it's out there enough.
I talked to a few people who don't really understand that voting thing.
A woman or a gentleman was on asking about it.
They don't understand that it's law ready.
Um, that you can't, you have to have an ID to vote.
You have to.
That's just how it is.
But.
this putting it into the Constitution, man alive, I'm a female.
And I get married.
I don't have the same last name on my birthday.
So that's what they're pushing for.
They've been talking about it all the time.
It's under the whatever.
But it's out there.
And people need to hear more about this constitutional thing.
I mean, no, but no, that is, this is wrong.
And CJ can go kick rocks.
I mean, how?
Because it will.
Ultimately it will change.
I mean back in the day it was you know X marks the spot Now you got to have a picture and in a hundred years from now It's gonna be something different eight five five seven five two four eight four two We don't mess around with the Constitution lightly the original Claire OC.
What's up girl?
Welcome.
What do you got for us?
Hey Tom, I got another silly joke for you
What do you call a guy that's hiding in the bushes
We're still alive, man.
Hey, Earl, I'm rooting for you, man.
All right, so I got good news and bad news.
I'll start with the bad news.
The bad news is, is I finished all my Girl Scout peanut butter sandwich cookies.
That's the bad news.
It was really tough.
The good news is, as I have a whole box of peanut butter patties to dive into, peanut butter on the mind, man.
So folks, have a wonderful evening.
Thank you so much for tuning in.
Thank you, Earl, man.
I always love hanging out with you, my friend, Earl Ingram.
Check him out tomorrow if he's still alive and kicking eight to 10 a.m.
Right here on the Civic Media Radio Network.
Thank you, Jess P.S., for all the hard work.
As always, you're a fine producer.
And thank you to our
fair audience for playing along, come back tomorrow.
James Santel, we're going to get caught up on the legalese of what's going on.
I swear to God, we're going to get to who's in charge over at the dumpside.
I don't know.
We have lots of folks who are potential candidates for that new leadership if there is some.
So stick around.
Pete Schwab with the Nightlight is coming up next.
Have a great evening.
We'll see you on the radio tomorrow.