
Transcript
S*#t You Need To Know: Impactful News For Wisconsin
S*#t You Need To Know · Tue May 26, 2026
Time for some sh** you need to know.
Well, we talked about this a little, uh, partial kind of because we talked about the potential ceasefire, but or the potential deal with Iran.
But now it is reported that U.S.
and Israeli jets struck Iranian vessels in the Strait of Hormuz and other targets.
Hours after the president has suggested that negotiations with Tehran over an interim deal were progressing.
I guess not fast enough for them.
The attack took place south of Larock Island in the Strait of Hormuz with several Iranian personnel killed that according to Iran's state-run News Bureau.
Trump earlier said negotiations between the U.S.
and Iran over an agreement to extend the ceasefire and reopen the Strait were, quote, proceeding nicely.
American forces hit missile launch sites in Iran and boats trying to place mines according to U.S.
Central Command.
The strikes were defensive and intended, quote, to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces.
U.S.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters during a trip to India that talks with Iran could take several days, adding that Trump would either agree to a good deal or make no deal at all.
Well, that's kind of what's been what's been happening since the beginning so that would check that would be right on par from sure from the beginning of this of this war It other stuff you need to know bringing it back to Wisconsin UW Madison is anticipating a smaller cohort of international graduate students on campus next fall That's according to the university's director of the graduate school the dean of the graduate school William Karpus said at a campus meeting last week that fewer international students
have applied to graduate programs, and the university has also admitted a smaller number than in previous years for next fall.
The drop in international student applications at UW-Madison during this admission cycle is an issue that every large university institution is confronting, according to Carpus.
The decrease in applications comes as the Trump administration has instituted a series of policies and actions targeting international students, such as new visa restrictions, travel bans, and also a crackdown on countries like China, which bring in large numbers of foreign students to schools like UW-Madison.
Now, experts say that those efforts, along with a looming rule change that limits the time international students can study in the US, are stirring fear and hesitation to apply to American universities.
Foreign student enrollment this spring at universities in the United States dropped by 20% from last year.
That's according to a recent report from the NAFSA, the Association of International Educators, which is a nonprofit that promotes international education.
Well, I mean, this makes perfect sense with the policies that we've seen.
I mean, it's hard to say, oh, let me go to this country, let me study, let me take my talents there when you're literally not welcome.
a nice big chunk of their budget every year and it also It also increases a university's status and just
the overall environment of a university when you have people from different nations, different cultures, all studying and, you know, you're getting, you're getting the smartest people if they're coming in for grad schools.
So
Well, and you also look at the fact that these are these are talents that you can't just duplicate always in the United States, right?
No.
These are these are skill sets.
Sometimes they are people who who do things much differently or have learned a different way to do things than we're doing them in the United States, which then also which is a broader discussion, but it leads you back to the where is all that information then going?
It's not coming to the United States.
It's being shared in other countries, which is unfortunate.
Governor Evers is asking President Trump for federal disaster declaration following severe storms and flooding across Wisconsin in April.
State officials estimate the storm caused more than $27 million in damage to homes, businesses, and public infrastructure across 19 counties and the United Nation.
Flooding and severe weather included tornadoes, hail, straight-line winds, and major rainfall events.
Janesville alone estimates roughly $10 million in infrastructure damage from what officials described as a 500-year flood event
Flooding also prompted evacuations in communities along the Chaktan, including Chaktan in New London.
Local officials said federal disaster aid is critical because many communities cannot absorb the repair costs on their own.
Out of Gamy County, leaders said both Tony Weed and Tammy Baldwin have expressed support for securing federal recovery assistance.
The request now goes to the White House, which will decide whether to approve federal recovery aid.
And we've seen this before.
If if only we had a Republican governor who bought into all the conspiracies in the election fraud, then we'd probably get that money right away.
We probably wouldn't have had to ask for it.
But now with Tony Evers in the governor's seat, we'll see if the president actually grants this money for American citizens, both Republican and Democrat or
tries to play games with it.
I mean, if you're the president, and if you're this administration sitting here just a few months before a midterm when, as we talked earlier this hour, your approval ratings are at 34%, I don't know if you just let a certain subsect of voters just wallow and have to come up with this money themselves to get these things fixed.
Nothing ever surprises me.
for the state of Wisconsin, then kudos to him as well.
Because this is money that's needed, right?
Honestly, at this point, who cares how it gets here?
Just sign it so people get some relief and small businesses can rebuild.
The big story, though, this morning, this is one that actually went a little under the radar last week.
The Environmental Protection Agency, speaking of this administration, announced nearly $2.9 billion nationwide to help states replace lead water pipes,
including $94.3 million for the state of Wisconsin.
This funding comes through the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund supported by the bipartisan infrastructure law passed in 2021.
About $46 million of Wisconsin's funding will support disadvantaged communities through grants or forgivable loans.
EPA officials said the funding will help communities identify lead service lines and replace aging pipes from curb to tap.
show Wisconsin still has more than this number is astounding to me.
The 343,000 lead service lines statewide and nearly 12 billion dollars in drinking water infrastructure needs over the next 20 years.
The state has faced lead pipe challenges for decades.
Some municipalities continuing to install lead service lines even into the 1970s long after other states stopped using them all together.
Lead exposure of course remains
a major public health issue.
We've heard these stories time and again, especially coming out of Milwaukee.
Children especially affected because it can cause long-term developmental and learning problems.
State data shows that nearly 5% of Wisconsin children under the age of six tested in 2024.
So not that long ago had lead poisoning with rates reaching around 20% in some Milwaukee neighborhoods.
EPA officials said the agency remains committed to federal
to a federal requirement calling for most lead pipes to be removed by 2037.
The funding announcement comes as the president has proposed major cuts to the EPA, revolving loan funds in the agency's 2027 budget proposal.
Wisconsin may also qualify for an additional $852,000 in redistributed federal lead replacement funding if the state applies by September.
You gotta imagine
that that paperwork is probably already being worked
I do find it interesting, though, that at the same time that's been happening in Milwaukee, and Milwaukee has had so many issues, Madison actually became a national example of what success in basically remedying lead pipes can look like.
In 2001, Madison made a very controversial decision at the time to replace both public and private lead lines entirely, and they became the first US city to eliminate all lead service lines from the water.
system.
Obviously, the decision is now viewed as a model for communities nationwide.
At the time, though, with the cost and the infrastructure changes, you can imagine that people were like, what are you doing?
But I mean,
be done, especially if you're living in one of these communities, if you're one of these 343,000 lead service lines, serviced people, you need clean water.
And again, to come back to the fact that we're still arguing over clean water is amazing to me.
Well, we got to get rid of the lead pipes, but we still got this PFAS.
We don't need to regulate those as much because, which is worth, lead or forever chemicals.
Neither one.
How about we just try to get the water clean?