Talking on all political subjects and taking on all colors, this is Matt Flynn direct with
your host Matt Flynn. Welcome to Matt Flynn direct. Come here statewide in live on civic
media. Our lines are open 844-967-2789. No subject is off limits and all points of view
are welcome. Remember you're not woke if you don't know history. You're not woke unless
until you know history going right to the front lines of history and the making, a lot of
it being made. But one of the largest stories, most important stories, the attack on American
servicemen and that basin Jordan that killed three terrific army, army members wounded more
than 40 more. More than 40 more. Apparently what happened, President Biden spoke very well on
it today. What happened was the Iranians apparently have trained some of their proxies to evade our
air defense systems by doing a couple of things. One of them coming in very low,
becoming very very low is very hard to pick up on an air defense system. But the other one is
we have our own drones that we send out from these bases, from our bases. When they return to our
base, if they aren't used, if they aren't suicide drones, in other words, if they aren't used to
just blow up, the Iranians have trained some of their proxies to follow our drones back and land
at approximately the same time. So our air defense systems might confuse them as friendly drones.
And one of them came in and blew up right near a place where our troops were sleeping, killed three
people and wounded more than 40 more. The question is what do we do? We have about 3,000 troops in
Jordan. We have about 2,500 in Iraq, about 900 in Syria. If you look at the whole region in the
Middle East, we probably have about 40,000 troops. These people are vulnerable. We do have air
defense systems. We have an aircraft carrier nearby. We have air power, sea power. We have navy
seals. We have special forces. But it's one of the things where if we're not waging an offensive
war, in other words, not putting them on the defensive, they just sit and plot on how to attack us.
And this has got to change. Now, President Biden gave an address today talking about this,
saying what heroes these soldiers were, he's going to be meeting with their parents this weekend
in the next couple of days, actually. And he wouldn't lay out what he was going to do to retaliate,
but he did say that he'd already consulted with the NSA in his defense department. And he's made
up his mind. Now, they range all the way from simply striking back at the proxies who did it and
killing a couple of them to hitting sites right in Iran. And you know, in 1988, under Reagan,
we did hit Iranian ships in the Persian Gulf. We did hit Iranian ships in the Persian Gulf.
Nobody wants to start a war. But when you have been attacked and your soldiers killed,
they've started a war. This business about, oh, well, you know, Iran didn't tell them to do this
particular one. They just gave them weapons and trained them how to do it and then sat back and
grinned. That doesn't cut it with me and doesn't cut it with anybody else. The other thing to keep
in mind about Iran, I should say, and Iran, they have drone factories that they're using to supply
Russia in Ukraine, to supply Hamas, to supply Hezbollah, to supply in Yemen the hoodies,
and to supply their proxies in Iraq and Syria. Some obvious sites to hit would be their navy
and their air force, their airfields, their drone factories. I know of two of them. There may be
others. The CIA knows where they all are. And frankly, they're nuclear facilities. The nuclear
facilities are underground. We'd have to use bunker busters and we have other technologies
we can go after them. But at some point, we have got to hit back in Iran in my opinion.
Now, if we hit back on Tehran itself, on civilian targets, if we hit back on their
their legislature, such as it is, they're holy men who run the country and kill them. I mean,
at some point, that's a full-scale war. But when your troops are killed, they've got to expect
that they're going to pay the piper. They've got to expect that they're going to pay the
piper. The other thing is to ramp up significantly the sanctions. We have sanctioned them.
But we haven't sanctioned them the way we sanctioned North Korea. They're degrees of sanctions.
The ultimate sanction would be a naval blockade. So nothing goes in and out. No oil comes out.
Can't make any money. That is something that we should consider. There is a bill pending in the
Senate past the House overwhelmingly by two-thirds to sanction their oil and prevent it shipment.
That's pending the Senate and it's been held up. But even short of that, monetary sanctions,
sanctions against individual businesses there, hitting them on secondary sanctions.
When the Turks and others evade our sanctions and trade with them, then you sanction the Turkish
banks that do it. That's all on the table. Biden didn't say what he would do. But I think he has
to do more than just hit back on these particular proxies. These particular proxies are simply
low-lifes who hang out there. They have no purpose. They have no culture. They have absolutely no
goals other than in the aggregate, they all want an international caliphate and the elimination
of Israel and Europe and everything else. Good luck with that one. That's going to take a
long time in the future. But in the short run, they're just in business basically to murder any
Western interests. And when there's nothing around for them to murder, they murder each other.
Soonies attack Shiites. Shiites attack soonies. Very important to keep this out of the United States.
Very, very important not to let this poison come into the United States. And I've never really
quite frankly understood how in our immigration policy we kind of blively open our doors
to immigration from countries that hate us. Not only do they hate us, they rally in the streets
and shout death to America, death to Israel. They have a whole across
humor day where they taunt. We don't want this. We don't want any of that in this country.
Very sadly, there's not unanimity among our people in this country, even sticking up for a
military. I've talked in the past about how the Republican Party wouldn't even promote our
officers for 10 months. And consistently is voted to shut the government down, which would mean
not paying our troops or being killed over there. And then at the same time, at the last minute,
you know, two hours before the deadline, jinging together some kind of contrived bill.
But there's a lot worse that they are doing. And I'm going to give you two examples.
And these are examples of something that Donald Trump said and that unbelievably
Marjorie Taylor Green just said. Let me start with Donald Trump.
There's a group, a veterans group, a veterans group ad that just got put out
and it features three gold star families. And these gold star families, obviously the gold star,
what that means is they lost a son or a daughter in combat or a spouse, but more likely a son or
a daughter. And they called out Trump for having referred to veterans as losers and suckers,
losers and suckers. And that's what he did.
When he went to Normandy, supposedly he was going to go to Normandy to honor our troops,
it was raining, so he decided not to go. But then when he went to Arlington with John Kelly,
he's a former four star marine general, John Kelly. John Kelly lost the son in Afghanistan,
he was killed. The marine second lieutenant killed in combat, killed in combat.
John Kelly, Trump's chief of staff is a gold star father. And they went and looked at the graves
and Trump turned to Kelly who had lost his son in Afghanistan and said,
pointing to the graves, what was in it for them? And he referred to them as losers and suckers,
our veterans. This is the guy who lied about having bone spurs and kept them out of Vietnam
in their people and the Republican Party who think he would be a good commander in chief.
And that is frankly disgusting. And I'm glad these gold star families are doing it.
The Marjorie Taylor Green, there's nothing she cheapens everything she touches,
cheapens everything she talks about. And here's what she just did.
Right after the three soldiers were killed, right after the three soldiers were just killed,
Marjorie Taylor Green joked about it. Just now, joked about three GIs getting killed and said,
quote, I think that these reservists would rather be guarding our southern border and protecting
our homeland than tragically getting killed. As but she says, if you saw the interview with the
mother and the father of the Brianna, if you get the last name, but a terrific specialist in the
army, who is one of the ones killed, the woman, early 20s. And you could see, you could tell the love
of the mother for the daughter and the father for the daughter and they were crying. And the mother
said, damn, I wish I'd talk to her before she left and told her that I love her and that she's not alone.
That she's not alone. And the Clown Marjorie Taylor Green thought this is funny. The Clown
Marjorie Taylor Green said, quote, I think those reservists would rather be guarding our southern
border and protecting our homeland than tragically getting killed. End quote. And the presidential
candidate she's supporting Donald Trump called veterans who were killed, suckers, losers.
End quote, what's in it for them? End quote to his own chief of staff who had lost his own son,
the second lieutenant in the Marine Corps in combat in Afghanistan.
The thing that rages me, frankly, more than anything about some of this Republican
perfidy is the coldness, the joking, and the lying about our own veterans. And we could never forget
that. Okay, we're going to step away for a moment. We're going to come back shortly. And we have
Donald Trump who solves 106 of his 521 companies to avoid scrutiny by a special master coming up.
Local community.
Welcome back to Mad Flynn Director. Lines are open. 844-967-2789. Before we talk about Donald Trump,
he was breaking news. You've probably seen it. I want to talk to you a little bit about the
law behind it. Alex Murta, the murderer down in South Carolina, he killed his son, his own son,
killed his own wife. And apparently there was some evidence. I remember some tape recording
that he just shot his son right in the face. His own son. He brought a motion. He got life in prison,
of course. He brought a motion to throw out the verdict and give him a new trial because of
misconduct by a court clerk. Now, I'll tell you what that was about. And also it's because a lot
of misconceptions floating around out there about what the standards are for something like that.
The clerk was named Rebecca Hill. And she had decided she wanted to write a book about the trial,
even in advance. And it was all starry-eyed and thought that a guilty verdict would really help sell
the book. So apparently when she had contact with the jury, remember something. Nobody's
supposed to have contact with the jury. The lawyers can't come up to them and try to talk to them
in the hallway. You can't do that. You can't go near a jury. But the obviously, of course,
staff that are around them, you know, the court will say, all rise, take the jury out for lunch.
You know, there's a bailiff and somebody else walks out with them and squirts them to wherever they're
going. So they do have a chance to interact and they're usually well trained. And they're told,
don't even think about commenting on the case. Don't even think about commenting on the case.
Well, this clown, this clerk, Rebecca Hill, would whisper initially, apparently, things like
don't be fooled, which is kind of ambiguous except there was before merch I was going to speak.
And then she also said,
um, uh, other other things that were that there wasn't evidence. It wasn't anything of that
nature, but it's pretty clear that she didn't like Murtaugh and thought he was guilty.
This is all presented to the judge and the judge interviewed all 12 jurors.
11 of them said either that they she hadn't said it to them. In other words, they hadn't heard it.
Or if they did hear it, it didn't make any difference at all. They went entirely on the evidence.
The 12th juror was ambivalent and said, well, you know, I didn't know what to do and the other
jurors pressured me. And so I, uh, I went guilty like them because I didn't want to sit there forever.
Now, uh, here's the deal. Somebody who's not used to try and case my look and then say, well,
the trial's perfect. Let's redo it. Well, no, no. It's not uncommon for people in merch on this case
just had this as a gift put in his lap. But I don't know if you remember the El Chapo trial. He's the
drug murderer from Mexico's tried in New York convicted and now he's spending life in prison
in the maximum security prison in the United States. But a jury, a juror came forward afterwards.
In my view, clearly bribed and said, uh, I, uh, I didn't obey the judges instructions. I followed
the case every day. I talked to people. I had made up my mind in advance about some things.
And it was kind of a textbook on, you know, the kind of elements you need overturn a verdict. Judges
are used to that kind of thing. If you had a new trial every time somebody, there was some
imperfection in the trial, you would never, ever, ever have a conclusive trial. If you had a wealthy
defendant or somebody that knew his way around a law firm. So they're very skeptical about it.
And it would have to be something very, very serious, not a law cloaks shooting a mouthful.
So for instance, obviously if somebody had evidence that or had had knowledge that an exhibit
was fraudulent or forged, that kind of thing. Absolutely. But in something like this,
where you have a, a clerk who wants to write a book and it's kind of full of herself and kind of
publicity speaking. Here's what the judge said. And denying his right to a new trial. Today,
that happened just before we went on the air. It's a nine Alex Murtaugh who murdered his wife
and his daughter in South Carolina. The judge said, foolish and fleeting comments by a publicity
hungry clerk do not warrant a new trial. And the judge was absolutely right. She was absolutely right.
She had the nail in the head. You can't do it in every case. And this was one that my view
wasn't even close. So I was very, very glad to see that the judge held the line because if you
did another trial, it's a very long trial with a lot of evidence. And you remember Murtaugh
testified in the first one, which frankly, I think he would have been convicted anyway,
but it was terrible. His testimony salted it away. The jurors were kind of holding their arms
leaning away from him thinking, you're flat out lying to me, your sociopath. And it was an
incredible trial. I watched part of it on television. But if you're talking to people about
trials, how you get a new trial, especially in a criminal case, it's a little more common in
civil case. So there's not common at all. But in a criminal case, there has to be extraordinary
misconduct, usually by one of the lawyers, perhaps something wrong with the evidence, but just having
a clerk shooting her mouth off because, well, what the heck, I want to write a book. That doesn't
hack it. That does not hack it. And I was very, very glad in this case to see that he didn't do it.
You will see an illusion. There was a mystery subpoena in the House of Representatives that just
went in to the Sergeant at Arms asking for documents. And initially, we didn't know what it was
about. And suddenly Mike Johnson goes, oh, sure, we'll give him the documents that was
thing. And that's sort of weird because subpoenas to the House of Representatives, you have
conflicts there with another with an equal authority in the government. You have a judge
wanting him from the House of Representatives. I mean, there's a question there of
comedy, COM ITY, meaning you have to be aware that this is an equal branch of government.
The reason it turns out that they were so much a laquity in giving them these things is because
the subpoena from the Department of Justice from a grand jury was for Cory Bush, whom
the Republicans don't like. She's a representative from Missouri. And apparently the allegation was
she had hired security because of threats against her and their threats against all members of
Congress now. And there's nothing wrong with it. The Federal Election Commission said that
is a useful, that is a appropriate use of campaign funds. So she hired a security firm, but
her husband works for the security firm. But this whole business of when you can hire a company
that your spouse works for is not uncommon in the Congress. So we're going to have to wait and see
how that shakes out. A lot of news whether coming up and we are going to talk about how Trump is
playing kind of fest and loose with his corporate forms to avoid paying his judgments coming up.
It is going to be cloudy and drizzly with a few flurries possible at times here throughout the
day today. Another dreary one with a high of 38th the wind northwest at 5 to 15 gradual clearing
tonight, 32 tomorrow, mostly sunny and a bit warmer with a high right around 43. I meet a
urologist Sean cable outside now. It's 35.
On your local civic media radio station and on the app.
Keep in South East Wisconsin informed. Engaged and entertained.
Welcome back to Madeline director. Lines are open. 844-967-2789 go right to the line.
Stephen of Green Bay, my friend. Thanks for calling. Stephen, what's your mind today?
Good afternoon, man. I hope you were doing well.
I have a little bit of ranting to do and I hope you've been helping me with this one.
I'm a regular listener. So you know that I listen to all of your guys' shows on the civic
media network fairly regularly and you hear about you know Trump and the shenanigans he's pulling
and Derek Van Orden and the things he did and how he thinks he's going to run for the third
district or Wisconsin to get reelected and it's just frustrating how these are how these
republican things that they can literally do whatever they want up to and including killing people
and there's going to be no consequence and they can just walk into an election year like there's
nothing happening but a Democrat comes out and says women should be able to choose what they should
do with their own bodies and you would think that they just bombed half of New York. That's
a little ridiculous. That's a good comment and you know something you put a finger on something
that I think is profound and that is that if you take a look at the program it's certainly
on what I discuss on this show and I think with some of my fellow hosts there's an inordinate
amount of talk about Trump. It's very negative and I don't mean that in a sort of personal
pejorative way but what he does, he does criminal stuff he has 91 indictments against him.
He continuously lies in all of that but relentlessly relentlessly all the oxygen in the room
is going to trump even though for negative purposes. What I tried to do and I and you frankly just
triggered my memory on it is more frequently talk about what we do and I'm a Democrat doesn't
mean this face it but what we do is and what Biden does in particular and I frequently do that
on economic matters. For instance we have the strongest recovery after the inflation crisis
and the COVID crisis of any country in the world, certainly any industrial country in the world.
Number two the lowest unemployment, three the largest job creation under Biden in two and a half
three years. His administration has presided over the creation of 14 million jobs.
He didn't create him himself of course not but the economic climate that you are responsible for
as a president for influencing and promoting does help to create them. The statistic I've used
before I'm going to use again right now since 1989 the fall of the Berlin Wall 98% of the new
jobs created in the United States were created under Democratic presidents 2% under the Republican
presidents and remember that would be George H. W. Bush George W. Bush and Trump 2% but under Clinton
Obama under Biden 98% Biden passed the chips act and I say passed it obviously Congress passed
it and he signed it it wouldn't have gotten passed it wouldn't even got out of the floor if he
weren't a master of the Senate Senate rules he's been there either as Senator vice president for
most of 50 years since 1972 hard infrastructure soft infrastructure holding NATO together reinforcing
NATO seeing NATO increase in numbers Finland for instance coming in Sweden shortly
by an aid to Ukraine avoiding getting us in a war creating a mini NATO in the Pacific
so that Japan South Korea Australia Vietnam the Philippines can band together with the United
States in the UK and stop Chinese domination of the South China Sea he's done remarkable things but
you know good news doesn't oh and not doesn't always good news doesn't get the same as attention
is bad news I mean you know many teams are named after you know the pirates the raiders
no no no teams are named after the good guys well there are the saints I guess by and large
people kind of exalt in and pay attention pay attention to evil and bad stuff I mean you know there
was a tour of in Chicago of Al Capone's you know what he did in Chicago where who does the tour
of somebody who is the head of United Way down there and is giving money out to poor people
so we tend to be fascinated with criminals and Trump is a criminal criminal I got to tell you
something when you practice law a long time I've never heard of anyone who is indicted a 91
felonies in four separate courts with different judges and different prosecutors who was totally flat
out innocent of all of it it just doesn't happen and you've seen two juries now in the defamation
cases involving E. Jean Carroll coming back with very significant very very significant damages
5 million and then 83.3 million and the 83.3 million what they said was the closing argument was
whatever money you think it takes it to make him stop it to make him stop it humiliating her attacking
her frightening her is a sadistic treatment streak and Trump so and even now I don't know if you
know this maybe you do but he gets nail for 5 million gets nail for 83.3 million so it suddenly
occurs to him if he if he defames her again they'll be know the lawsuit but you know what he just did
he posts on his true social repose articles that other people wrote attacking her without comment
so his argument was well I didn't say anything I just reposted it you want to suit somebody
sue them now I'll tell you as a defamation lawyer I have represented media in defending defamation
claims I will say that if you relentlessly as a pattern just keep reposting things you said before
I I think that is defamatory but it's less clear and who wants to have to go start a lawsuit every
week but this poor woman E. Jean Carroll gave an interview on Rachel Maddo last night she had her
two lawyers she had Roberta Kaplan and a woman named Crowley excellent lawyers and she was
related but also described how frightened she had been she a single woman frail 80 years old what
she's walking around the street in New York with Trump and tens of millions of followers as
it given her death threats of them she got a pitball and she keeps a gun in her apartment which in
New York is very difficult most people don't do it um to continue to attack her
sadistically like that is uh is is is unbalanced but you know I'm getting back into the same
stick you know I start so it's Steven and Green Bay just now uh yeah it's all about Trump and then
Van Orden's another piece of work we have some very good candidates up against Van Orden I think
we're going to win Van Orden's a guy that brings a loaded gun in an airport through a through a
metal detector in Iowa it rules don't apply to the guy he's a guy who went to the insurrection
went up to the Capitol use campaign money to pay his way he's an insurrectionist
folks in the third district I know him there's a lot of good folks there uh my nephew's graduate
of the UW lacquer uh the UW lacrosse people don't go for that kind of stuff
go back to the lines dick the maddest of my friend thanks Colin dick what's in your mind today
oh I saw some of that interview too and it's it's just so pathetic I'm every level but um
you know after the first one last fall with Eugene Carroll um I remember reading something
in one of the Eastern pay I think it was in New York times and she said basically it's not
about the money because she's pretty well to do herself and she said what it is about is just what
you said Matt she wants her life back and she wants to be left alone and don't and don't have
his crazies threatening her all the time and I guess what I'm going to say here is if this guy
opens his pie hole one more time about any of this I'm going to be furious if they don't put him in
jail immediately and force this it has to be done because he's just flying in the face of this
the poor woman like he said 80 years old and she has to deal with this kind of nonsense
it's not right right no yeah excellent call dick I couldn't agree more
well I'm gonna talk about something that he's doing to hide his assets and pay attention to this
because it's very boring stuff normally but everybody goes I talk to people they go oh well he's
got nailed for 83 million maybe you'll have to sell Trump tower oh well engoran may judge
engoran may find him 370 million so that's it for him well not so quick just came out there is a
a monitor putting charge of his properties remember one of the judges did that to make sure he didn't
try to hide assets she just filed a report her name is Barbara Jones former judge file the report
he has 521 companies he has already dissolved the 106 of them
and when she asked for information on them he waited eight months and she kept asking for it eight
months and then when it is all done and he shuffled the assets around the some skeleton type
information real little information the parents of the 521 companies this call the parent company
is the Trump organization now Trump's attorneys attacked Barbara Jones for saying that what she
said is misleading and disingenuous nothing just misleading and disingenuous file the report read
the report the judge accepted the report you got to keep something in mind the average person
who is rich and crooked is not like you they don't pay their bills I had a case one time against
the guy who owed money down in Arizona that took his deposition and he had a very large house
and we were going to foreclose on it he had incorporated each room the living room was a separate
corporation the dining room the kitchen the den and each one was an LLC that had some member other
than him him and one of his kids this that and the other thing and so untangling that almost
requires separate lawsuits foreclosure lawsuits against each room and you see where I'm going
with this if you have 521 companies and you sneakily dissolve the 106 of them and stone walled
the special monitor what's very very possible is if he gets nailed for three hundred and seventy
million and the eighty three million so called four hundred fifty million and I don't know
what engrons gonna do I mean engrons gonna come out with some kind of a decision this week it could
be three fifty it could be two seventy it could be fifty I don't know what he's gonna come out with
and the tissue James is also trying to get him barred in the real estate industry for life which
can also spill over in other states but don't kid yourself that he's gonna suddenly show up with
a check for that kind of money don't kid yourself what's going to happen is that assets are going
to be shuffled among these companies some will be dissolved some some of the companies will have
investors quote-unquote minority investors who have rights and weren't previously disclosed
and it'll take separate litigation and this will go on and on
now I talk to weep and willow how to cry welcome back to my friend director lines are open eight four four nine six seven two seven eight nine
school degree school degree school degree in Georgia why does that not surprise me
why does that not surprise me school degree in Georgia the the republican house
overwhelmingly republican gerrymandered in Georgia passed a bill yesterday to revive a commission
to discipline and remove fanny willis they don't say that what it's for it's just a commission
to discipline and remove DA's well I wonder who that would be I wonder who that would be
can you name any other DA in Georgia that's been in the news I can't
it passed 9575 party line every democrat against it every republican for it
it's house bill 881 881
the Georgia Senate the committee did the same thing last week
now one thing to keep in mind that you may not remember is this happened last year
and what ended up happening was
camp the governor signed it but that bill had a provision in it that said the supreme court had
to create rules for this commission the supreme court said we don't think we have the power to do
anything with DA's except when it comes to the practice of law well this time they took that
provision out to the supreme court can't hold it up one of the lines david of san francisco my
friend thanks for calling david what's in your mind today oh thanks man yeah it's um I'm glad
you're describing this because it's so obvious this should be the simplest case that could ever
be dealt with you know they have a tape recording of Donald Trump saying all police secretary of
state give me just steal me 12,000 votes i'm just a poor and and so they are going out of their way
spending Georgia tax dollars on on every other kind of effort to make sure that trump does not
get prosecuted on a very simple obvious case and and he doesn't even deny it you know he he keeps
claiming that he's got a residential immunity from prosecution but he's not he's not denying
that he did it and then of course it gets into the other layers of the corruption you know with
you know the fake the fake delegates to the electoral college that the state of Georgia
has still never really removed all of those people from their positions of power and when you
start looking at the republican party that's gone out of their way to you know they're still fund
raising there they're an official you know 501c4 organization or whatever their
tax status is they should have been yanked the secretary of state should yank their corporate
charter the republican party should have had their corporate charter's yanked for being participants
in an illegal operation like that and the idea that a non-profit status is supposed to be providing
public good and they not only don't provide public good but they try to sabotage our very
lights to vote in an honest election it's preposterous and you think about the various states
you know including west constant you know that these people the fake electors are still in positions
of power and the republican party not only is never apologized for it but they've gone out of
their way to double down that they have every right to do this or that this was an anomaly or
whatever excuses they're coming up with the only solace I've got with this is even the republicans
are refusing to donate to the republican party now because they see them as organized crime
yeah that's an excellent insight excellent excellent insight and one of the tragic things here
is that the fake electors are not being prosecuted in fact they're not being dealt with it all
and the sad thing is that Wisconsin's involvement remember chesa bro was from Wisconsin I think he
I don't know if it was was saw Steven's point central Wisconsin somewhere and there is reference
to a telephone call maybe a meeting I forget with the chairman of the republican party at the time
it's mentioned in the indictment jack smiths indictment in Washington it's mentioned in
funny willses and the michigan attorney general to her credit has prosecuted the fake electors
there but you're right the fake electors here and and one of the biggest proponents of them is
Ron Johnson our senator who never should have been our senator but that was a bungled call believe
me in the in the last senate election and he's going around sticking up for the fake electors
and so and you're right they they're they're brazen at this hack they every right to do it and blah blah blah
and but they're being prosecuted in Georgia and in michigan and then Trump himself is being prosecuted
obviously Washington DC Trump is also being prosecuted in Georgia and remember so is Giuliani
and remembers Sidney Powell and chesa bro and the rest of them took a dive and then ratted and
they cooperated and all that i want to get back to Georgia however so this crowd wants to get rid
of fanny willis not because she's not a great prosecutor the first time around the reason was
she's a little light on prosecuting possession of marijuana and doctors who perform abortions and
she said i'm not going to prosecute possession of marijuana i only have so many staff and i have
rapes i have burglaries they have gang activity and drugs that's what i'm going to prosecute and then
on doctors who perform abortions she said no i'm not prosecuting them at all for that they were
going to remove her the Supreme Court there said on the first iteration of this legislation well
we're not we the Supreme Court doesn't have the power to set up rules for this rump commission
and so it died but now they're doing it without the requirement of the Supreme Court doing it
and they're going to anchor what because she has a relationship with another prosecutor
another prosecutor who's working for what we call low bono a low hourly rate it's his firm
and he's already gotten a number of convictions of pleas and he's going after trump that's
why they want to pull him this is a crooked deal absolutely crooked deal keep that in mind
coming up a lot of news a lot of weather and mike johnson is doing his best to torpedo the
border deal in ukraine aid coming out the cloud out of cover up a clear blue sky and the tears
that i cried for that woman are going to flood you big river and i am going to set the right here
until i die
