Talking on all political subjects and taking on all colors, this is Matt Flynn direct with
your host, Matt Flynn. Welcome back to the second hour of Matt Flynn direct
coming to you statewide in live on civic media. Our lines are open 844-967-2789.
We're right to the lines to take you in order. Bob of Madison, my friend, your first
first in your mind, Bob. Well, I think we've got to undercut some of these arguments.
The Trump people, they're being indicted not as a political prosecution, but as legitimate
prosecution of which 95% of the witnesses are all Republicans that were hired by Trump or
so. And at that point needs to be made clear to the holdouts in the Fox and the audience and stuff
like that. The extremists are listening to this slide over and over and over again that
it's a political process and the counter to that is to cite that all the witnesses are almost
all the witnesses are Republicans and often Republican lawyers and refuting all the big
lies stuff. I think that's the 32nd ads that they got to start running. They've tried
running ads at Fox News and it had no effect. So I don't know where you go with such a stubborn
click that you're up against. But I think the Republicans are after Trump, not the Democrats.
I think we can make a theme like that and sell it to the middle class or the middle rotors.
I think it has a pretty deep insight and let me what I liked about the way you presented it was very
dispassionate. It's not strident. You say, look, this is not a political prosecution because
it's Republicans doing it. They're providing the evidence. It wasn't a Democrat who said that
his fifth avenue apartment was 30,000 square feet. It wasn't a Democrat who advised him to
sneakily get 168 million dollars in interest payments that he wasn't entitled to. And you know,
if anybody else had it, it wouldn't even be on the front page. The guy who's been the who's
gal by now. I think that's a very, very good point. I hope people out there who are listening to
this and who are talking to people who may be skeptical, approach Trump people. I keep that in mind.
These are Republican witnesses, Mark Meadows, Giuliani, the rest of them have read it on them.
And there are others who have read it on them too. Thanks a lot for calling Bob. Gene
Will Claire, my friend, you're next, what's your mind, Eugene?
Hi, Matt. Great to see you. In the state of Wisconsin, I think you have to be in office for at
least one year served one year of your term before you can be recalled. So I don't know what that
date would be for Bob. But anyhow, you know, we're still being assaulted by the people of January
six that try to overturn the election because they can continue to lie, even though when the facts
are out there, they continue to get people roused about. And it's just it's unbelievable to me.
And I wish people who are on the fence who really haven't seen this. I wish they would watch,
watch. I'm telling you to watch a meeting, watch some of the meetings that the Congress holds
and see the people that they put in charge of the committees. They have no ideas. They don't
try to work on any of the people's problems. And all they do is try to raise chaos and dysfunction
and spread lies. I mean, I couldn't believe it, you know, when I was watching yesterday when they
were trying to go after Hunter Biden. And it was like, you know, Biden, Hunter Biden wasn't even
in the Capitol. He wasn't had anything to do with the government. And, you know, and then call
them names and using growth terms. Some of the women on the Republican Party, it was like,
I didn't know what I was watching. I thought, you know, if these people were never in trouble,
were up the court without a battle with these people running the show. And they're on strategic
committees. They're overseeing a military. They're overseeing workforce development. They're
overseeing health in the workplace. I mean, you guys got to pay attention. These people got to go.
I'm serious about that. We can't talk to watches, Matt. Young people need to watch and see what they
need to fight for. As always, Jane, two things. One, there was an excellent thought that I didn't have
that when Blaske gets reassigned to his new district, he will not have been in that district for
a year. I have a feeling this recall isn't going anywhere. But secondly, what you said is right
on the money. And there's absolutely no integrity. You know, there has been partisan conflict in the
past. I'm very familiar with it. I've been involved in it. But I've never seen this level of dishonest
criminal conduct on the part of a party, the Republican Party and the absolutely, you know, going
after 100 Biden and not going after Jared Kushner, you know, that kind of thing and posting naked
pictures of them naked pictures in the in a committee hearing naked pictures. And then,
you know, talking about his genitals and all this. I mean, this is the Republican Party. Not the
Republican Party. I remember as a kid. I'll tell you that. Thanks for calling. John Boaz. And for
those of you out there, I believe John Boaz is a village in Richland County. John Boaz. Thanks
for calling. What's in your mind today? Yes. Matthew and we're known for the mastodon that was
found here in 1897. Right. I've seen there was a mastodon skeleton there. Yeah, that's exactly
right. Well, thank you. Yeah. Well, I would like to talk about the current news in Madison.
If you caught the news about this rookie cop, get high high speed chase. And then the
offender who was killed from crashing. Now, what kind of a rookie cop is trained to chase somebody
down when I was a child. I was chased by the cops in our town because I was riding my minibike.
And he ran that minibike over then. Well, sorry to hear that, John. But yeah, one thing. I
am not I want to come in on what you said because it's an important issue. And then we're going
to go to the next caller. I'm not familiar with that news in Madison to be candid with you. So
I've not seen that. But in Milwaukee, there has been a rash of police chases that have involved
deaths and not just of the perpetrator, but of innocent people as a pregnant woman. You know,
the perpetrator goes at 90 miles an hour down Capitol Drive, which is a major thoroughfare.
And broadsizer was got met Milwaukee had a police chief who was one of the best in the country.
Ed Flynn, no relation to me, but he was one of the best. And he got foul got a foul of the
common council because they said to him, they have no police and experience. You're not chasing
people who steal cars. And he said, you can kill people by doing that, but I can track it down
otherwise and get them. They said, no, you got to chase them. And he said, well, that's not good
policing. And then basically they squeezed them out and they put other people in who now chase.
It's a very bad idea. When I was in law school, I wrote a an article called Police Accountability
in Wisconsin. And you can look it up in the Wisconsin Law Review. It's 1974 Wisconsin Law Review.
And in it, a high speed chase is essentially the use of deadly force because a 90 mile an hour
car going down Capitol Drive or say State Street and Madison or wherever it is, you might as well
fire a bullet and it kills people. And yet at common law, you couldn't use, couldn't use deadly
force to pursue somebody who hadn't committed a felony. So I advised don't chase people.
Call it off. But these younger cops, a lot of times they get their blood up and they do it.
So whatever town in Wisconsin, you're from whatever city, if there have been deaths by these
chases, get up at a meeting and say, no, we don't want these chases. There are other police
methods. Don't do it. That's an important call you just made, John. And you weaved in some of
your own background. And I was sorry to hear some of that, but I appreciate your calls as always.
From Boas, Wisconsin, Mark from the sack, my friend. You're next. What's your mind anymore?
Yeah, thanks for taking my call, Matt. Yeah, that you mentioned Newt Gingrich and Danny Hastert.
And both of them left in some disgrace. And Hastert's disgrace is far worse than he was
involved in sexually molesting or raping children. He served time for that. And what's
ironic to me is the Congress Republicans still apply the Hastert rule. You would think that they
would have reinvented that to get his name out of there because whenever I hear it, maybe I'm
a little bit better informed than some that I think, well, why are you still invoking a child
rapist to, as a rule you have in Congress there, that Newt Gingrich's, one of his misdeeds was
helping speed along the citizenship for Rupert Murdoch or some involvement in some publication
of some book there that was a little untoward. And it just is, but why men like, I mean,
Newt Gingrich is still politically relevant is just kind of seconding to me.
Yeah, I agree with that. Newt Gingrich, by the way, he was the one that tried to just get Clinton
and keep going after Clinton. But in 1998, now 1998 was six years into Clinton's two terms.
And the book on that, the rule of thumb is not that in the middle of the second term of an incumbent,
the other party should pick up 20, 30 seats. He ended up losing a couple of seats. And the
minute that happened because they knew how bad he was. They knew how incompetent he was and
how crooked he was. The Republican Party wouldn't support him anymore and they put it in a new speaker.
So I have nothing good to say about Newt Gingrich. He was one of the first to really put divisiveness
into our government. And he was utterly untrustworthy, utterly untrustworthy.
Coming up, we're going to get to the issue of Trump doing work for the Chinese bank.
And we're also going to get to South Africa's claim against Israel. Coming up.
The rambler, the gambler, the back batter, tell them that God's going to put you down.
And I diamonds.com. You're listening to the show.
Welcome back to Mad Finn director. Lines are open 844-967-2789.
Well, Trump came right out and said it. You recall, I think it was in yesterday's show.
I said that the Democrats when they were in Congress were when they control Congress
under Pelosi were able to look at four of 500 accounts that Trump had or 500 businesses or
business entities that had been getting foreign money. And looking at four of them,
four of them, he got $7.8 million while he was president. And 5 million of that or more
was from China. And there's obviously in the other 496 ways he could have gotten it,
there's plenty more. This guy's the money machine. And everybody speculated
because unfortunately the Republicans won after the four months of this investigation and they shut
it down. McCarthy shut it down. But the investigation showed 5. I think, I don't know,
6 million of the 7.8 came from China. I had always had a question. What's that all about?
Why did China give you 5.8 million? 5.6 and some of it was from a Chinese bank.
Well, Trump just came out and he was asked that question. And here's what he said.
He said, I was doing services, quote, unquote, doing services
for that foreign money. And what he was trying to do was saying it wasn't just a bribe. In other
words, they didn't just give it to him. I did services. Oh, really? Okay. What kind of services?
I'd like to do those kind of services. If a bank's going to give me 5.8 million, I'll do,
you know, fine. What do you want me to do? You want me to recite the introduction of
the Canterbury Tales or something? I mean, what kind of services? You don't know jack about
Chinese banks. It turns out the Chinese bank that's at issue was a bank that had been
permanently circumventing American sanctions, international sanctions, and North Korea over
their nuclear program. And yet they paid Trump 5.7 million. And that's only the initial part
of the investigation. I think we are entitled to know what those services were. He used the
term services. I was doing services for him. Well, you're an accountant. You're doing their
accounting. You're fine. They're taxes. They don't pay taxes over there. If G likes him,
they pay no taxes. If he doesn't like him, he taxes him to death. There's a crooked deal.
It's a crooked country. It's a crooked culture. What services were you doing?
What services were you doing? And that question should be asked for all the other entities that
paid him, all the other entities that paid him, including Egypt, Nigeria, and all the rest.
What kind of services were you doing? Jack, you're president of the United States. You're
precluded in the Constitution for making a profit of any foreign country. What were you doing?
Another issue, another issue that's come up, South Africa, has filed a complaint in the
World Court, the International Court in the Hague alleging that Israel is committing genocide.
Now, this falls, and South Africa should be reminded that at one time, under apartheid,
the United States and Israel and a lot of other countries cited Vanilsen Mandela to get rid of
that. So thanks a lot. Let me tell you what's going on here. Israel was
tacked on October 7 without provocation. 1200 Israelis were killed and a lot of women were butchered.
They were sexually mutilated. 12, 13, 14-year-old girls were raped and their genitals were mutilated.
The nails, guns, and knives. These are animals that did that in Hamas. Israel went in. You cannot
possibly tolerate that. You can't possibly, especially when Hamas says we're going to keep doing it
and doing it and doing it. There's a cauldron of hate and it went in there and they killed a lot of
them and they're still looking for them. You can't tolerate that. South Africa said nothing about that.
Let me tell you something about the World Court, the International Court. Guess who doesn't belong to
it? The United States. Why not? The United States doesn't belong to it because they opened up a
file against us, the United States, that's still pending for alleged genocide in Afghanistan,
for going to try to save the Afghans from the Taliban.
People in the international community said, okay, there's a group called ISIS. Why don't you open
up a file against them? They're murdering Christians. They've murdered hundreds of thousands of
Christians in the Middle East and Iraq and in Africa. This World Bank said, well, they're not a
country, so we have no jurisdiction. We said, okay, then go against Hamas. They're not a country.
We'd have no jurisdiction. They only open up files in Israel and the United States. Now,
the judges, who are these judges? Many of them are Africans from Muslim countries in Africa
who sit in robes paid by Europeans and they stroke their chins and then they say, well,
anybody who kills anybody in these countries in Afghanistan, anybody in the Middle East or
Africa and they come from Europe and the United States is genocide. But if the provocation for it
is even greater sadism in genocide by the other side, we don't have jurisdiction.
They're a fraud. This world, first of all, the international court should be composed basically of
judges from Europe, the United States and African countries and Asian countries that can be trusted
and they aren't deeply anti-Semitic and deeply opposed to Judeo-Christianity. This is an
absolute fraud and I have this to say from the clowns from South Africa. Many of us, all the liberals
in the United States and in Europe stood with you, stood with Nelson Mandela when apartheid was
there and we're not putting up with this. So my advice to the Europeans is, why are you paying
these clown judges? Why aren't you taking their robes handcuffing them, flying them somewhere in
Africa and letting them out of the highway? That's what they deserve. They're no good, they're no damn
good. China doesn't belong to it either, the world court because of what they're doing with their
Uyghurs. Russia doesn't belong to it because of what they're doing in Ukraine. So Russia, China,
don't belong to it. The United States would belong to it if they would say, okay, we'll go against
ISIS, we'll go against Hamas and when it comes to Afghanistan, you have to understand something,
the Afghan government invited us in. The Taliban or the Sadist, we were fighting them. We spent a lot
of money to do that and then we finally said, if the Afghan government isn't going to stand up,
why should we? Whenever you hear the word international court, world court is a scam,
it's crooked. They are against Western civilization, they're against the United States and Europe,
they don't care about ISIS and they don't care about Hamas. So it's important that you have full
historical information on what's going on there. Well, coming up a lot of news and weather
and you will see Tiffany Fitzgerald and growthman of Wisconsin, disgracing themselves. Coming up.
Better all the time.
Welcome back to Madeline Director, lines are open, 844-967-2789. Going right to the line, Steve,
cut a hay, my friend. Thanks for coming, Mr. Mayor Listeem.
Hey, Matt, it's a frequent caller, but I have to take notice on your, it's really in South Africa,
an analogy. When Israel was formed in 1948 and back then for decades, the United Nations
and the world had embargoes on the part side government of South Africa,
Israel reached out to them to find out how they can displace the Palestinians in the same way,
how they wanted to displace in South Africa, the Blacks. They were the first to continually have
under the middle finger of the United Nations and the World Court. They's numerously sold
weapons systems to South Africa with the ongoing war with the ANGLE.
Steve, hold on a second. Let me tell you something. I certainly respect you, but that's
baloney. That's propaganda. The fact of the matter is that the Israelis were not trying to
displace anyone. They were formed in 1948. Truman recognized them right away. They were
immediately invaded by the surrounding, all the surrounding Arab countries. They fought back.
They were invaded three times. They have offered many, many times to keep the boundaries as they
were and keep up a Palestinian state and they've been attacked. They've been nothing but attacked.
They've been nothing. I don't know where you're getting your information, but I suggest that you
read some other history books other than the ones you're talking about because that is absolutely
baloney and not the case that they were trying to get any advice about getting rid of Palestinians.
They wanted to live with Palestinians alongside them and this is a country that's nine miles wide
at its narrowest and 80 miles wide as long as and they've been continuously attacked. So I don't
buy that at all, not even remotely. Okay, so now we're going to go to something else.
I told you about Tiffany. I told you about Fitzgerald and I told you about growthman. Well, here's
the deal. They all voted in committee to hold Hunter Biden in contempt. All voted in committee.
Growthman apparently was silent. Tiffany and Fitzgerald spouted off. One of the things I loved
about this part of it is that there's a Democratic congresswoman named Madeline Dean from Pennsylvania
and she proposed to the amendment. I love this amendment. I would have proposed it. She says,
all right, the hold Hunter Biden in contempt and I amended to say we also hold Jared Kushner in
contempt for the two billion dollars that he got from Saudi Arabia and his refusal to talk about it.
Tiffany, who is a real piece of work, I don't know how I know that he thinks it's a Republican
district. Much of that district was my friend Dave Obie's district and Dave Obie is a guy who
held it quite well for almost 40 years, I think. He was elected in a special election in 1969
after Alvin Okansky, the prior guy had had it and he held it to something like 2009.
I mean, it's a terrific run, terrific run, 2010 in any of them. Tiffany somehow is defiling that
state and here's what Tiffany says, quote, to Madeline Dean, your amendment is, quote, another hit
piece designed to obfuscate the issue in hand, which is under Biden. All right, let's talk about
that. I'm with Madeline Dean and I'm going to tell you why I'm with Madeline Dean. I'm with
Madeline Dean because Hunter Biden gets two billion dollars with a B for the Saudis who have
money to burn. I mean, the crown prince spent 500 million on a yacht. He spent over 100 million
of painting by an obscure European artist, 100 million dollars. He doesn't care. He doesn't care.
His oil is gold. And so in any event, two billion in the crown prince goes,
I managed that for me. Well, hey, where's my two billion? I'll manage it for you. The truth of
the matter is that under Biden, I couldn't find his rear end if he had both hands in his
back pockets when it comes to managing money or anything else for that matter. So he takes it and
crown prince doesn't care what he invested in. Why is this important? Because a money manager
like that will get 2% of the amount being managed every year. 2% of 2 billion is 40 million.
So what he gets is 40 million a year paycheck, the rest of his life as long as he has an
undermanagement, 40 million dollars. And his only overhead is a couple of computer terminals,
some staff, some secretaries. That's pretty sweet. That's a bribe. And that went to Donald
Trump. And even through his Senate law, now Donald Trump, think about this. Donald Trump
stuck by the crown prince when it came to the Kishoggi thing. In 2018, Donald Trump is on the
take from the Russians and from the Saudis. In 2018, some Saudi military people who were being
trained by us in Florida brought pistols to the class and shot our sailors. Kill them. Kill them.
The, the ones that didn't do the shooting were then just deported back to Saudi Arabia without
any interrogation by the FBI, come to find out that they had been going up to New York City on
weekends, scouting bombing targets. Now any, any decent American president would have criticized
that maybe, maybe sanctioned Saudi Arabia, maybe kept all of those Saudi people in the country.
Well, they could be roasted by the FBI. No, Trump, let them all go. And then Trump goes,
yeah, this is sad, but I talked to the crown prince and he is very, very unhappy that it happened.
In return, Jared Kushner gets $2 billion in 40 million a year. And you're telling me that they're
investigating what? Hunter Biden, go ahead, investigate him. I have no brief for him. I'm not trying
to do anything for him, but how about also the guy getting 40 million a year? Give me a break.
Give me a break. And the clown Tiffany goes to Madeline Dean. Well, it's a hit piece
irrelevant issue in hand is Hunter Biden. So the issue basically is, if it's the Democrat,
we'll go after him. If it's the Republican who made multiples of this and is making it every year
and his father-in-law is a crook. And now I head in the Republican primary,
and Saudi Arabia and Putin are licking their chops. That's okay. This is a corrupt Congress.
The Republican Party, the few exceptions, Adam Kinzinger is an exception. This chain,
there are others. There are others. It's corrupt. Very corrupt. All right, I'm going to the lines.
Todd or Billy, Madison, my friend. Thanks for calling.
Hey, Matt, good to talk to you this afternoon. You know, all the things that are being pursued
right now in terms of getting Biden or excuse me, getting Trump off the ballot in terms of
constituting Donald Trump. Those are all appropriate and should be pursued. And I don't think any of
them are going to necessarily bear fruit, especially in the time that we need them to.
Yes, those things still should happen. But more than anything, we just need to beat the
socks off of Trump and the MAGA movement at the ballot box. That would be a better outcome
than anything else. That's going to make more of a difference than any prosecution, etc.
And we're going to do it. That's my feeling. Hope you have a great afternoon, Matt.
Yeah, you know, I like your, I like your spirit. I love you calls. And thank you for that call.
In other words, look, we're going to beat this guy right now. Our Democratic candidate for the
Senate in Michigan is way ahead of the Republican. I think that there's some underlying text going
through people's minds around the country that says, you know, something they're bothered by Trump.
They really are bothered by the criminality. I think that's exactly right.
Thanks for going back to the lines. Northwood's Terry, my friend. Thanks for going to Northwood's
Terry. What's in your mind today? Well, again, Matt, I'm in Tiffany's district.
And I was talking to a gentleman this morning at Minards, older fella. And he said,
and I've heard just some different ones before. People that I encountered try to have a civil
conversation with Joe Biden spending is what's causing inflation. This is what I hear from people.
But I've heard style say it too. So that's their talking point, Matt. So that's all I got.
Yeah, that's no, that's good. Thank you, Northwood's Terry. Northwood's Terry is from the 7th
congressional district. I have relatives in the 7th congressional district, brother-in-law in
Hayward, Hayward, Wisconsin, nephew, and niece-in-law in Wisconsin. Rapids. It's great. It's a great
part of the state. And it used to be that Dave Obey represented it. And now what's happened? I
don't know what's happened. But what they're saying is baloney that is Biden spending, you kidding me?
The pandemic spending was necessary. And a lot of that came from Trump. You just had to do it
or the country would fall apart. But Biden right now in the Chips Act, in hard infrastructure,
and soft infrastructure has produced the lowest unemployment and the largest job growth,
which yields taxes since Vietnam War. Going back to the lines. Jack of Merrimack, my friend.
Thanks for going, Jack. What's in your mind today? Yeah, first of all, regarding inflation,
according to Business Insider and the Wall Street Journal, roughly two thirds of so-called
inflation is big corporations raising prices. And you can tell it to, this is why it is,
because they're getting record profits. And they're raising prices because they can do it and
blame it on inflation. So guess it was causing the inflation. But that's only a part of this thing.
Another part of it is, and this is from an article in Reuters, but I'm sure other news organizations
have it dated April 30, 2020. And that is, you wonder why our gas prices were going up for
quite a bit of time. Well, on that date, they reported that Trump had called the
Saudi and he basically told them cut production. And essentially, the reason for that was because
that was in the middle of the pandemic. People weren't using much gas. And our oil companies were,
they weren't losing money, but their profits were going down. And he just did it to increase the
profits. Again, gee, that sounds like price-colleging to me. So all this stuff about blaming,
blaming Biden for inflation, blaming Biden for the immigration problem, blaming Biden.
First of all, most of it's not Biden. And secondly, all this is being done is to stir up anger and
hate and fear so that people will hate Biden and vote blindly for any Republican that gets
on the ballot, and unfortunately, including an insurrectionist. My rant today anyway.
It's not a rant. It's not a rant. You're a professional educator and you made up some very good
points. And I'll point out something else. It was just announced that 20 million people have
signed up for the Affordable Care Act, Obamacare, in the last year. It was one of the great pieces
of legislation. Joe Biden was one of the point guys on it when he was Vice President,
of course, Barack Obama deserves the credit. And the country is fighting inflation more
effectively than any other industrial or other country in the world. Biden has done a superb job.
And they just come right out and say this stuff. It's Biden spending. Oh, really, well,
what spending don't you want? You don't want Social Security. You don't want Medicare. You won't
Medicaid. What is it you don't want? You don't want hard infrastructure. You don't want people
building bridges and highways and water systems. You don't want that. You don't want soft infrastructure.
What is it you don't want? They always talk generally. It's this and that and they sit on their
butts and they do nothing. And that's good if they're not up to some criminal mischief,
but some of them in that house caucus are really bad news. They're really bad news.
Coming up, coming up very shortly, we have a civil rights lawsuit out of Harvard.
You should know the details about it coming up.
You should know the details about it coming up very shortly.
You should know the details about it coming up very shortly.
Welcome back to Matt Flynn director lines are open 844-967-2789.
Well, there's a civil rights lawsuit the civil rights act of 1964 filed against Harvard
University. It's about time and it mirrors one that was filed against NYU New York University.
University of Pennsylvania and Berkeley. And I'll tell you what should be filed against MIT
Cornell and a lot of others. It's filed by Jewish students who will ledge in it and they are
correct that these universities are not protecting them from attack assault harassment based
on race religion, which are the the effective parts of the statute and they're absolutely right.
What's happened is they're organized people on these campuses and many of them are foreign
students come from the Middle East, Africa, Asia, deeply anti-Semitic and they harass them.
They will surround them like two or three guys will surround a Jewish girl and yell at her and
scream at her and Harvard they actually punched some kid in the business school going along.
That can't be tolerated. That cannot no longer be tolerated. We're not putting up with that. We're
not putting up with it in the great state universities like University of Wisconsin system. It's
happening in California. It's happening in Berkeley. It's happening elsewhere. There has been
insufficient attention given this organized anti-Semitism that is really nothing more than attack
unwesternd civilization and on the United States. These people that are doing this look on Jewish people
is somehow the face of Western civilization. Israel is very much part of the West and
intellectually and culturally and desires to live in peace with everybody around it and they're
constantly attacked. Well, what it does is it it peels off the thin veneer of civilization and it
unmasks some deep anti-Semitism in Europe and in some places in this country. We're not putting
up with it anymore. Not putting up with it anymore. Harvard had a clown as the president is
clutting gay. Penn had a clown. Plot of clowns. MIT has a clown. Why the clowns? Why not get them
the hell out? And then you have a convocation. First of all, you screen your admissions standards
and also admissions of foreign students. 30% of the students at MIT are from foreign countries.
Many of them deeply on their submitted cultures. Why are we putting up with this?
Why are we putting up with this? We can no longer put up with it. And I hope that the plaintiffs
in the Harvard case are successful and they get large damages quite frankly out of Harvard
and the rest of these universities. I'm tired of this. One of the lines, Dave and Matt is
my friend. Thanks for calling. Dave, what's in your mind today? Yeah, you mentioned Berkeley.
There's a lawsuit against the board region to the University of California system.
And it alleges that Jews can't participate in student groups and that's largely true,
at least on the left side because there's about 36 or over 36 organizations that refuse
to allow Jews to become part of those organizations unless they denounce this real
if they support Israel in any way. And Israel is part of Jewish identity, so it's talking,
they're talking about, if you're Jewish in any way, you can't participate on the progressive side.
Now that's just pure anti-Semitism. And by the way, Jews are extremely progressive.
For example, there's about 36 members of Congress who are Jewish or 36, only two of them are Republicans,
the rest are Democrats. And you know, as Barney Frank, I forget what the name of the committee
is said in our House, the counterpart to the House Finance Committee, I mean to the Senate
of Finance Committee, we should say that Jews are the most reliable democratic voters. Jews
are the most reliable democratic voters Barney Frank used to say he's both. But anyway,
yeah, it's really, really a problem and if someone progressive, you know, and if I was a student,
if someone progressive, it really, it's something that really, really bothers me because that
it appears with the entire Jewish community not being able to participate in the progressive
politics that they generally adhere to. Yeah, you're absolutely right. And this has happened
all around the country and these student groups get money from the universities. The minute they
say that anybody can't join because of their religion, their race or anything like that,
unless they renounce their First Amendment rights, they should disqualify that student organization,
get them a hell off of campus, get rid of them, get rid of them, expel those kids and any of them
that come from foreign country, deport them immediately. This is America, we're not putting
up with this crap. Kurt, a Madison, my friend, what's up on your mind? Kurt of Madison.
Kurt of Madison.
Hi, yeah, you know, ever since this harbor thing came up, I decided as going to do is deep
of a dive as I could on K, dig into her background, figure out who she was where she came from,
in addition to what you had already shared with everybody. And I got into a discussion with someone
and I said, you know, it really comes down to this. It's not the plagiarism. She is the top doc.
I don't care about her background. Her failure to handle the problem
was grounds enough for her to be fired. Plain and simple, if you want to move up the ladder
to the top, then be prepared to do the job. If you don't do the job, you need to be fired,
you're out. Goodbye. That's the way I see it. Plain and simple.
Yeah, you know, you hit the nail in the head and the same was true of the president of
the University of Pennsylvania. And then she got out and then the president of MIT is bad news.
But you're right. If you're the president of a university, and we've had some great ones,
and there's one chancellor that I think very highly of Mark Moni of UWM, University of Wisconsin,
Milwaukee, he's an outstanding chancellor. He could be a chancellor anywhere and he could be the
president of university anywhere. And he does the right thing, but he does it with an iron fist
and a velvet club. And people understand they accept he is a leader. Those people, Claudeine Gay,
the woman in Pennsylvania and at US Pennsylvania and the one at MIT were bad news. They were
in over their heads. They had no business having those positions. We're coming to the end of the
show coming up another great show. Devils Avig with them and crew.
Collars were great today. Thank you all for calling. Collars are a core part of this show.
I learned a lot from the callers and my other callers learned from each other. I really appreciate
it. Matt Flynn directly back same time same place tomorrow. I'm signing off for today.