
Broadcasting across the state of Wisconsin on the Civic Media Radio Network and around the world on the Civic Media app.
This is the Dom Salvia Show.
And now, here's your host, Dom Salvia.
And
welcome to the Dom Salvia show.
Thank you so much for tuning in.
You can be a part eight five five seven five two four eight four two eight five five Seven five Civic got just PS working hard on the board today and our super secret guest We got a reference a little bit yesterday.
Well, it has come through and super jazz is held to introduce to you Wisconsin's Supreme Court candidate circa Dane County circuit court judge Susan Crawford judge Crawford.
Welcome to the Dom Salvia show
Do we have the judge?
There we go.
All right.
It is great to be here.
Thank you so much.
All right.
Thank you so much.
Glad you can join us.
A judge before we get into it, you know, we're five days out.
How you feeling right now?
We are feeling great, feeling really strong and Chris crossing the state, talking to as many voters.
as we can just fighting for every last vote as we lead up to the election
day.
Judge Susan Crawford joining me today.
I want to get spent a minute or two if we could please on your on your bio on your background.
My understanding you grew up in Chippewa Falls.
Is that correct?
That is true.
Yes.
Excellent.
Go ahead.
Proud graduate of Chi High.
High school there, triple falls high school, one of four kids.
It was a great place to grow up.
And you stayed in Wisconsin your college career, getting an English degree from Lawrence University in Appleton.
My brother got an English degree from Lawrence University in Appleton.
What made you stick around for your undergraduate, Susan?
Well, you know, I was paying my own way in college dom and I had to watch the dollars and cents and Lawrence University was really generous with scholarships and gave me a great financial aid package.
So that was a but I got a great education there.
It was a great place for me to go to school.
Excellent.
It was a fine institution.
Cruz the Ave.
College Avenue up there when I was a kid.
Judge Crawford joining me today.
Let's get into perhaps, of course, why you're here running for the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
Why is it that you're running judge?
What are you hoping to accomplish here?
What drives you to seek this office?
Yeah, you know Dom I've always just throughout my whole legal career look for ways that I can use my experience and my skills to protect Wisconsinites under our laws and Constitution and I've been doing that now for about six and a half years as a circuit court judge case by case family by family and this is an opportunity for me to take that really to a statewide basis to take part in decisions that will protect Wisconsinites under our laws.
You know, the, the role of the Wisconsin Supreme Court is, as I think is, is confusing to some folks.
And if we, if we allow ourselves to look at the many, many plethora of ads that are just all over the airwaves, I think people will get a, a misimpression.
What judge, do you consider the role of the Wisconsin Supreme Court here in the state of Wisconsin?
Yeah, so the Supreme Court is the final court in our state court system and that means that cases come to them after they have gone through the circuit court often after they have gone through the court of appeals and then you know lawyers for their clients can ask the Supreme Court to take up cases and they only take up cases if at least three justices on the court believe that the case raises an important issue that needs to be decided by the Supreme Court, so there's
You know, usually a lot has happened.
There might have been a trial or hearings where evidence was presented.
And by the time the case comes to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, it boils down usually to just one or two really central legal issues that the Supreme Court has to decide.
So Judge Crawford, you're not like, you're not taking testimony from witnesses.
There's no, no like, like a Matlock kind of court action going on the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
That's not how it works.
That's exactly right.
So there are no trials heard by the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
The hearings that happen in front of the Wisconsin Supreme Court are called oral arguments and their opportunities for the lawyers to present their arguments on the legal issues before the court and for the justices to ask them questions about their positions and really kind of dig into
the precedents that they're citing and the kind of finer points of interpreting the law.
Folks, you're listening to the Dom Salvia Show, our guest today, Judge Susan Crawford.
She is a Dane County circuit short court judge.
She is seeking a spot on the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
We're happy to have you with us, Judge Crawford.
What do you want people to know about you?
Why should people vote for you?
What do you want people to know about your record that would encourage them to get out and support your efforts
here?
Starting point I'd want people to know is about my judicial philosophy and that is that I believe our laws and constitution exist to protect the rights of Wisconsinites and they should be interpreted with that purpose in mind and to make sure that our rights are all.
Oh, looks like we lost Judge Crawford.
Folks are listening to the Dom Salvia show judge Susan Crawford.
Perhaps we can reconnect that at some point.
We'll make the efforts again running for Wisconsin's supreme court.
She's a Dane County circuit court judge and we've been saying it the whole time folks go vote for her.
Don't vote for the BS.
Stay away from the BS.
We have the judges back.
All right.
Welcome, Susan.
Sorry about that.
Not sure what happened there.
Welcome back to the
test.
All
right.
So anyway, Tom, you know, I hope we, I have a couple of more minutes.
Just wanted
to,
you know, I'm really working to protect the rights of Wisconsinites under a laws and constitution.
I have really broad legal experience, both working as a prosecutor, working in our court.
Courtrooms as a lawyer to fight for the rights of Wisconsinites, and now six and a half years or so on the bench as a judge.
So I have, and I've argued several cases in front of the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
So I know how things work up there.
And I want to bring all that experience as both a lawyer and a judge to the highest court to help out Wisconsin families and communities.
Judge, I've seen your statements protecting the basic rights and freedoms of Wisconsinites.
I mean, I absolutely agree with that.
How does that happen?
How do you apply that philosophy as a justice on the Wisconsin Supreme Court?
Well, the Wisconsin Supreme Court gets cases every year.
They take up cases every year that affect our fundamental rights and freedoms.
So those might be issues like the right to vote or our fair elections or women's reproductive health care rights.
So that has certainly been a
an issue that is occupying the Wisconsin Supreme Court's time this very term.
There are two cases pending before the Supreme Court that'll decide whether women have the right to make their own health care decisions during pregnancy.
And you can foresee in the future that the Supreme Court will take up cases.
This is just based on past experience, but they will take up cases that involve
community safety, public safety issues, things like the safety of our drinking water in Wisconsin.
That's been a really hot issue in courts across the state as communities are dealing with things like PFAS contamination and issues like that.
Any number of issues that involve health and safety of Wisconsinites and our ability to
make our own decisions about our private and personal lives and, um, to, you know, exercise the freedoms that we have under the constitution.
Folks are listening to the Dom Salvia show.
That is judge Susan Crawford, candidate for Wisconsin's supreme court, uh, judge, uh, the money in the race.
And, and on this program, we talk in lament a lot about the money in politics in general, and it just keeps getting more and more to our opinion out of hand.
Uh, Wisconsin democracy campaign, estimating that perhaps this.
election cycle will blow past a hundred million dollars and we have the richest man in the world who is not a wisconsin citizen uh jumping in and funding your opponent in this race what's what's your sense on where we stand uh not only in in your race susan but certainly as as a country with with the money in our politics in our elections
yeah well you know i never expected it to get quite this out of hand um but here we are and that's because elon musk has decided
to
weighed into a state judicial race and tried to buy himself a seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
So he has spent upwards of $20 million to prop up Brad Jimmel's campaign.
He's out there funding paid canvassers who are going door-to-door handing out leaflets that say things like, support the Trump agenda, put Brad Jimmel on the Supreme Court.
And that is absolutely not what the Supreme Court is for.
And there are a lot of different reasons why Elon Musk might be doing this, not the least of which is that his company Tesla filed a lawsuit against the state of Wisconsin within days of Elon Musk starting to spend millions of dollars on the race.
So he's got some financial stakes here.
I think he is making this a test case to see whether he can be successful in buying a justice on the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
And if he manages to do it, I think we'll see him doing this around the country.
Judge Crawford, you mentioned the Canvasser.
There was an article recently, a Canvasser, recorded in the suburbs of Milwaukee.
And my point to the question here, Susan, is they redacted.
They didn't put out the person's name for fear of retribution.
And we're certainly seemingly in a different environment than we were years ago.
And safety can be a concern.
Have you had any issues, personal safety threats of those kinds in the selection cycle?
Well, Tom, that is...
Something that I can't answer personally I will say more broadly that Judicial security has been a growing concern across the country and certainly a concern in Wisconsin It's something that the state court system is paying a great deal of attention to right now And we have taken precautions as a campaign.
That's about all I can say about that But there are people who are threatening our judges.
We're seeing that happening nationally
when lawsuits have been filed against some of the actions taken by the so-called DOGE that Elon Musk is running.
And Elon Musk is calling for the impeachment of judges, not even because they're ruling against him, but because they're just saying, hey, we gotta put a halt to what's going on to give the court a chance to take some evidence and figure out the lawfulness of some of these actions.
Elon Musk is saying,
get those judges off the court.
That is just un-American, and it is unconstitutional for him to be saying things like that.
But, you know, an unfortunate side effect of it is that those judges are being targeted and threatened, and, you know, Wisconsinites and Americans should not stand for that.
It's a shame we even have to talk about it and ask the question.
Judge Crawford, in the last 45 seconds, if you would please, growing up in Chippewa Falls, are you a fan of the beer?
And if so, what do you prefer, a summer shandy, a grapefruit shandy, or the Oktoberfest?
I have to reject all those choices down and say Lining Google's original.
a line is
original the
pure essence of Chippewa Falls not just line of cool judge Susan Crawford good luck judge Crawford we will be rooting for you five days out folks get to it thank you for coming around
fantastic thanks so much Dom
thank you
And welcome back to the Dom Salvia show eight five five seven five two four eight four two eight five five seven five Civic one.
I think our most recent guest judge Susan Crawford in County Tucker court judge candidate for Wisconsin's Supreme Court five days out man.
It's coming quick.
Oh, yeah It is coming quick.
So I'm gonna vote on unvoted day on the day.
I'm gonna do the thing
sticker you get
I like the experience of voting on voting day.
My dad always gives me a hard time about it.
He's like, you don't know if you'll have time.
I'll make time, dad.
We'll make time.
We'll make time.
Well, hang on.
When COVID was around, I'm not going to vote.
I'm absentee balloted.
Well, right.
Yeah, that was a different world.
It was.
It's a blur now.
So thank you, Judge Susan Crawford.
Folks, you know how we are here because it's lots of folks are early voting.
A lot of the wild counties, Waukesha, Ozaki, Washington County, lots of up to, I believe the number I saw was a half a million.
Yeah, about 500,000
early voters.
So you could be a part of that if you choose.
Go ahead and do so.
But if you don't get it to it this week, April 1st is the day.
Don't
be an April fool.
No, that's right.
And vote for Judge Susan.
Crawford.
Come on, man.
She went to Lawrence University.
I went to Appleton Xavier.
I mean, it's the same
place every mile.
Stopping
ground.
I mean, I may have been sneaking into some of those bars when she was in school there.
I mean, I'm just saying it's entirely possible.
855-752-4842.
Thanks for playing along, folks.
We got a lot to get to today.
But before, before we get too far ahead, let me remind you.
It's our break into spring text-to-win statewide contest.
I was messing with the voice.
I was like, I'm not going to do that.
I thought about it worked out.
No, I'm not going to do that.
It's our break into spring text-to-win statewide contest.
Today's keyword.
All right.
Today's keyword, it's easy.
It's fun, FUN, fun.
We love to have fun on this program.
We try to have fun, right?
We try to.
fun.
So download the civic media app, find your favorite civic media radio station, hit the text button at the bottom of that screen and send the keyword fun.
F U N. We are having fun today.
F U N for your chance to win.
And today, today's the drawing is what you got a chance to win.
Brewer tickets.
Yeah.
Opening date.
Baby brewers are playing right now.
New York Yankees.
They trail two to one in the seventh
home.
Uh, but it's, it's been a tight
game.
Come on, crew.
Come on, crew.
Uh, so there we go.
Folks, uh, get the civic media app and send the keyword fun for your chance to win some sweet Milwaukee Brewers club level tickets.
They are good tickets.
I'm going to grab a couple of those for the summer.
I think eight, five, five, seven, five, two, four, eight, four, two.
Uh, let's get some callers and some folks jumping in here early in the text lines.
Let's get to it.
Dale from Wausau.
You will be next.
Welcome, Dale.
What do you got for us?
Yeah, thanks for taking my call, Dom.
On the Supreme Court race, you know, it would be good to have a top echelon person from Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce on one of the shows to give their thoughts on Judge Schimmel.
There's 9,020 of us companies that are part of Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce.
And I would like to think, I would like to find out exactly what our group, Wisconsin
Manufacturers at Commerce, think about voting for Judge Schimmel.
Well, Dale, if you're a member of the Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce, what's your thought about voting for Judge Schimmel?
I guess in voting for anyone, it's fair to hear both sides.
And so it would be good if we had somebody from Wisconsin Manufacturers Commerce speak about Judge Schimmel.
Well, I appreciate that Dale.
Let me ask you something, the ads, the money in the politics, Dale.
Do you think like me that this is getting to be a little over the top?
Have you been able to even watch any broadcast television lately, cable television?
Yeah, it's, it's over, over the top.
That's for sure.
And, you know, just kind of decide here.
Well, I mean what what what matters to you Dale?
I guess that's that's what it comes down to and who and who do you believe has the character?
You know, I mean, how do you how do you you know?
How do you judge who you sit next to the bar man?
How do you judge who you work with?
How do you judge who you hang out with?
You know, I'm saying what are what are those things that are important to you?
And you try to find you know the candidate that the best matches that and that's the most basic part of it So, you know what what drives you, you know politically what are your concerns about?
locally from a from a legal perspective hell if you're an if you're a manufacturer
What are your concerns on that regard?
What do you think about guys like Elon Musk coming in and spreading that kind of money around?
Dale, I mean, you know, how do you make those determinations and what's important to you, sir?
Well, it's it's hard for me to believe that that all 9,020 of us companies that are part of the Manufacturers of Commerce all agree,
you
know where the other
right
And so that certainly isn't the case in any group of 9,020 people or entities.
Yeah, there's gonna be a break and I guess that's the point right?
What is what where has WMC come down on this?
We can do a Google search and find out see if they've actually made any public statements on that on that yadda let me ask you are you in manufacturing and has this current and Call it business climate and this under this administration have any impact on you yet Or do you think maybe it will in the future with regards to tariffs and and whatnot?
I'm scared
What are
you scared of what what's coming
coming down the line here and what has already transpired.
Yeah, Dale.
Thanks for the call.
I appreciate you chiming in and giving us your opinion.
I think there is a reason to be concerned.
We did just see yesterday, and perhaps we'll get to it today as well, that the administration down Trump is imposing 25% tariffs on automakers.
That they're bringing their cars in Ford is down almost 4% today GM is down over 7% today Tesla up just a little bit There's real there's real impact on that again There's the initial shock of the whole thing and then there's you know what eventually happens and what you know It's one thing to say what you're gonna do is something to actually do it
But Dale, yeah, man, we need people of good character, people of good business sense, people that are more concerned about us as citizens versus their own eagle or their pocketbook, man.
That's what I'm looking for.
And you can see with people how they've conducted their lives.
If you look at BS and Crawford, what's their history been?
Who did they support?
What causes did they take up?
That tells you a lot about them, man.
So if I were you...
for Susan Crawford.
Thanks for playing Dale.
Come back with us 855-752-4842.
you
And welcome back to the Dom Salvia Show 855-752-484-2855-755.
Civic got just PS on the board.
You folks are lining up on the phones and the text.
And don't forget the text.
It's our break into spring text to win statewide contest.
Download the Civic Media app.
Find your favorite radio station.
Click the text button at the bottom of the screen and send the keyword fun.
Fun for your chance to win some Brewer tickets or good tickets.
Check them out.
They're playing right now.
Open it.
There you go, Brewers.
So, yeah, play along with us.
Text the word in fun.
You got to do it through the app and you got a chance to win some of these tickets, eight, five, five, seven, five, two, four, eight, four, two.
Interesting call from our guide Dale up in Wausau.
Appreciate the thoughtfulness.
If you don't know, don't know, you can be difficult and it takes a lot of time to evaluate, right?
How do you do it?
You know, my mind's changed over time, man.
So really, where are you at today and what's important to you today?
And then hopefully we can, you know, kind of step outside of ourselves and say, okay, what's important to my neighbors, my friends, my family, to our community, to our state, right?
To our country, to the world, you know, depends on how you want to look at it.
But specifically, as Dale was inquiring about Wisconsin manufacturers and commerce, apparently, Dale, a member thereof, 9,000 members, he was saying, jumped on the Google machine, found this.
Polling, released by Wisconsin manufacturers and commerce, WMC, from earlier this month.
Polling conducted March 9th and 10th, shows, quote, a 4747 split.
between former attorney general BS and our favorite judge, Susan Crawford.
5% of voters are yet undecided in the race.
So this was earlier this month, a couple of weeks ago.
Scott Manley, I know that cat.
Like many Wisconsin statewide elections, this race is very close and will come down to the wire.
This is a winnable race for either candidate right now and will simply boil down to whichever side does a better job of getting out their voters.
Yes, I agree with
you
there, Scott.
It really cannot be overstated how much is on the line.
Well, that's an interesting thought.
Okay.
Yeah.
That's the only quote we got.
Uh,
so part of the other Googling searching machine, uh, with politics, uh, found this from just a week ago, fair courts, America and WMC issues, mobilization council launched new ads targeting Crawford.
So while, uh,
What was it in Bauer?
I believe it was kind of reference.
Well, it
was on the
line.
Okay.
Well, they're, they're issues arm, they're advocacy portion of WMC lighten up judge Crawford.
For what?
Oh, the 60 years of raping a girl is face 60 years and the letter go, or, you know, whatever the, the, the, the,
one of
those ads, if you go to their website, all bunch of YouTubes, weak sentencing for violent criminals, dangerous criminals, let off easy.
Three years instead of 25 so Wisconsin manufacturers even though their memberships are 50 50 their issue advocacy arm
is
all on Against Crawford and of course when you're against Crawford you're for shimmel.
So Dale, there's your answer man 8 5 5 7 5 2 4 8 4 2 Len from Madison your next welcome one.
What do you got for us?
Hey, sir, you guys are doing great today.
Thank
you.
Yeah much like Dale
I'm having some difficulty making sense of this race.
And when we hear about Elon Musk putting money into the campaign for Schimel, what I haven't heard is the money from George Soros that's gone towards Crawford's campaign.
And my concern when I hear that is that all of the other jurisdictions around the country that have had elections of attorney generals or district attorneys in big cities like San Francisco or Los Angeles or
Whenever Soros has backed the candidate, a couple of years down the line, the electors are all having buyers remorse because of the politics, the policies that are put in place by these Soros candidates.
And I think almost universally they're getting kicked out because of the.
I would
say a couple of things.
Number one, my understanding is Soros is nowhere near the amount of money that
Musk has put in, right?
Two million versus 20 million.
So that, that's, that's, it's not even in the same.
It's still a lot of money, man.
You know, and I mean, the money in the politics of money in, in, in electing judges, it should not be like this.
It should not be a hundred million dollars.
That is outrageous.
Now that being said, um, listen, I mean, you know, Crawford worked for, uh, uh,
pro-choice organizations, right?
I mean, that's one of the things that she did in her career.
And we know, you know, Brad Schimmel worked for WMC, you know what I mean?
So I think that the, the, the lines are pretty much drawn here, Len.
And, and so I think we both agree money and pop.
Do you agree, Len, that the money in the politics that we're having right now is, is, is over the top and should not, should be addressed.
Do you agree with that statement?
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
I'm with
you on that.
So that's beside the point.
Now it comes down to the background of these judges.
Now, of course, as you know, I'm liberal these days.
So I guess that means I'm voting for that liberal justice.
But I mean, really, I'm down.
And I've been able to be a little
I'm going to say up close and personal with Brett Schimmel, but I've been doing this radio for like 13, 14 years, something like that here in the state of Wisconsin.
And I've gotten to see that cat over and over again and color me unimpressed, man.
Uh, just, and I'm not, I'm not being personal about it.
I'm just saying, no, that's not me.
And if you trust by judgment, then you can take that for what it is.
But if you're down for someone that wants to do the bidding of Elon Musk and WMC, well, then that, then that's your guy.
If you're down for someone who has a history of fighting for women's reproductive rights, which I'm down with, that doesn't mean she's gonna vote this way or that way on things, but that's her background.
That's where she came from.
And I'm more down with that, man.
I mean, Brad Schummel thinks it's totally fine.
It's 1879 law, abortion law, no exceptions for rape or incest.
What's wrong with that law, he said?
I mean, man, I mean, I'm not, I'm not a single shoe guy, but that's a deal breaker.
I mean, the guy has literally no concept of that.
And just the way he cares himself, it is demeanor in the ways he says things.
And when I've heard them over the years, uh, and, and the rape kit thing was, was an issue.
And then when people come out and they, the office, get the lie, they spin.
And it wasn't what it was, man.
I mean, those, those are just constant tells.
constant tells.
And Hagedorn is a Republican, and he worked for Scott Walker during the Act 10 thing.
He's been fairly objective.
A couple of those rulings have gone against Republicans, and they're freaking out about it.
Hell, you even have Brett Schimel saying we can't have another Hagedorn on the bench.
I mean, Hagedorn now is what, a Rhino?
I mean, we're just getting pulled so hard, Len.
It's just, it's, it's, it's overstepping its bounds and it's like they're trying to outright each other.
Uh, and, and I don't think, uh, I mean, I think the background from, from what I know of, of Judge Crawford, I'm totally down, especially when I have to compare it to the guy I know real well in BS.
Len, your thoughts.
Uh, if you had to, uh, give arguments for why Crawford or why, uh, a Schimel would be
Uh, tough on crime, which is a big thing right now.
Um, yeah, but they're not doing that man.
Hang on.
Hang on.
They're not
tough on crime.
That's why these ads are so fricking stupid, Len.
None.
And that's why when you had the conversation with Crawford in the first segment, that's why I brought it up.
I mean, these folks aren't, this is not what they're doing, man.
They're not at this point at this level.
That's not their thing.
And if I'm to believe any of the ads, Len, everybody sucks and we're all going to get raped and murdered.
And they're, and the, the, the, the perpetrators of those crimes will be let go.
if I'm to believe these ads.
So I just discount that stuff, man.
And certainly there are going to be cases and situations in everybody's career, I would imagine, that could have gone a different way or should have been something handled.
I think Crawford had a staffer that didn't file some paperwork on time.
Yeah, okay, that falls under her preview under that umbrella.
Okay, fine.
But this isn't what's happening.
Right now at this level on this court, that's not what they're dealing with.
So now it comes down to, you know, what is your, how do you interpret the Constitution?
What do you value as the rights and supporting of your constituents?
How do you base that?
Does it ebb and flow based on the win, based on the money, based on the influence ban?
I mean, I don't want that, man.
I don't want that.
Final thoughts, Len.
I'm just glad that Crawford is willing to
consider changing the maps and we might get a little bit better representation with a couple more Democrat representatives if she's elected.
And I'm with you 100%.
I just hope that if she gets elected that we don't have the biology remorse that the other candidates across the country that were supported by George Soros have elicited.
Well,
and again, man, I'm not I hear I know the crime up and down in Santa Fran I hear what you're saying about sorry You could go down the list and they could who the you lines have supported, you know on on the right At the end of the day, it's kind of a pointless not pointless But we both agree the money is is a big problem that that's a big problem We shouldn't be in the situation and as I mentioned to Judge Crawford and what bothers me man is this is this vitriol this this angst you know judges are getting threatened right now
You know this this canvasser that's getting paid for by must to support BS You know What they the newspaper when they did their story didn't want to release her name out of fair retribution for her and I am I applaud the General Sentinel for not doing that because this is real.
It's unfortunate
But I can't believe that this is the situation we're in.
That should never happen anyway.
And no Musk truck should not be being fire-bombed.
That's not an answer.
That's not okay.
So, I mean, I'm hoping consistent in that.
And people's personal safety should not be threatened because they uphold the law or they view and rule on a case a certain way.
I mean, my God, if I acted that way, but every time things didn't go my way, I'd be like Donald Trump.
Join us eight five five seven five two four eight four two eight five five seven five civic Genie from old Claire.
You are up.
Happy day, Genie.
Welcome.
What do you got for us?
I was gonna have you refresh my senior memory regarding, you know, the Wisconsin manufacturers and commerce.
I remember all the people coming from my side of the state to speak to, you know, um, their representatives, you know, in a hearing and
they had to wait for hours and hours while wisconsin manufacturers and commerce and american prosperity were sitting in the top chairs and they totally ignored all the people that you know spent the day trying to talk to the representatives and you know and that was the time when you know people were sitting in the capital i remember seeing it they didn't cover it on my side the state watching it and other means and in crying when they were
a hand cupping people in their seventies behind their back seventies eighties
genie octogenarians putting old older women you know their their hands behind their back with zip ties like like that's necessary uh yeah that's that's that's that's not great stuff and genie thank you for the call we certainly appreciate you listening up in oh
Claire, you know, the money, the money, they always get it, man.
You know, I mean, they're, they're, they're always going to be, unfortunately, this is how it is, at least as it stands now.
And again, as a, as a citizenry, as we the people, we can change that.
We could absolutely change it.
We could change it.
So those money influence cannot spend that kind of money.
It wasn't always like that.
We could make it not like that again.
If, if we came together and agreed that that's how we want it to be, you know, how, how about genie that our voices are equal?
to the, you know, whatever, whatever lobbyist.
And now when we talk about, our proud Tom talks about lobbying.
I mean, lobbying is, you know,
getting redressed from your government.
You gotta be able to ask for something.
You know what I mean?
I know lobbying in a sense is a bad word, but at the end of the day, if I couldn't go and try to get in front of my congressman or my senator and plead my case, if I can't lobby, well, then I really can't go to your government to get your grievances addressed.
You know what I'm saying?
We have to be able to lobby.
So again, but there can be restrictions in the professional paid lobbyist thing.
There are, we can address those.
We can do that if we choose.
But we have to, I think you gotta, what do you gotta do?
You gotta identify the problem, right?
You gotta recognize this real.
Oh, I'm an alcoholic.
Hi, Dom.
Hi, Dom.
You know, first you gotta recognize it.
And, and I think, you know, some of those folks, some folks out there, you know, right-leaning, independent, whatever.
Oh, the money in politics makes, it makes everything worse.
It just does.
And even, I'm gonna keep on saying it.
If you believe that money is speech, well, speech can be restricted.
You cannot yell fire in a crowded theater.
Don't give a damn what you think your freedom of speech is.
And if we're gonna use our freedom of speech to burn down this country in our election system, I think we have a justified position that we can convince righties, lefties, middles, those that don't engage just because, you know, no one wants to see the commercials.
Or, you know, maybe public financing, maybe a window of 30, 60 days, something along those lines.
We can do it.
We're the American people.
We can do whatever we want if we...
Put our mind to it.
Come back with us.
Put your mind to it.
8-5-5-7-5-2-4-8-4-2 Elon Musk, who is paying out a million dollars to subcat in Green Bay for signing the petition.
We'll talk all about it plus your calls.
8-5-5-7-5 Civic.
you
Welcome back to the Dom Salvia Show 855-752-4842-855-75 at Civic, your last chance this hour, the break into spring text to win contest download.
The Civic Media app, find your favorite radio station, click on the text button at the bottom of the screen and send the keyword, fun!
We're having fun!
Girls just wanna have fun!
It'll be real fun to go to a brewer's game with your tickets.
Oh, that's
right.
Yes these the contest today Brewers Malki Brewer Club level tickets and the Brewers are playing right now.
I don't know if I have a score
update for you.
Oh No,
oh No,
it's for one Yankees
top
of the eighth.
Oh man
pictures getting tired
That's it.
Season's over.
Oh, there's always next year.
Can't wait for football to start.
We're having fun.
So text the keyword fun on the civic media app and you can win some of those tickets.
Potentially it's a contest.
It's a statewide contest eight five five seven five two four eight four.
We talked about Elon Musk, a couple of things.
That's always commuting today.
I was caught in some traffic at 43 south on just north of Milwaukee.
And so I was just kind of going out of the traffic and looking at my phone and I saw an article from the journal Sentinel anti Elon Musk plane flies over Milwaukee days before high stakes, Wisconsin Supreme court election.
I was like, huh, that's interesting.
And I look up and there it is.
That's amazing.
That's a good reporting.
It's a little weird.
But you'll look at that.
Right.
So one of those little planes with the banner flying behind it.
And the banner said, go home, Elon.
Vote Susan.
So that was that was amusing and of course when I saw the headline I saw the plans.
I was just I was wildly amused.
It's easy Key to happiness be easily amused.
Oh, absolutely
Journal Sun also reporting that Musk threw another million into next week's Supreme Court race But unlike his most recent spending on attack ads and canvassers He said the sum went to just one voter Musk took to X to announce Wednesday that Scott a
From Green Bay had won the sum for signing Musk's petition in opposition to activist judges
I'm not when I when I saw this initially, I was like, well, I don't remember him saying he has someone who's going to win a million dollars.
No, I do remember him not being able to, you know, get enough people to sign it because they want to sign it.
So he's paying people a hundred dollars
to sign his
petition.
But I don't remember that the point that, hey, I'll pay you a hundred and then to put you in to win a
million.
No, no, this seems just out of left
field.
I mean, come on, man.
Really?
I mean, the richest man in the world is this dishing away million dollars at a
crack it's nothing to him I know really nothing to us man you don't gotta know thank you mm-hmm off with all that man go home like the plane says go home Elon vote Susan yeah
so at this point there's been 80 something million dollars spent on the Supreme Court race Elon Musk has spent over 20
Million dollars so far that is a full quarter a full quarter of the spending is coming from one man 25%
That's good radio math coming from one dude the richest man in the world who doesn't live here
Correct, but he's got some dealerships.
He wants open.
So he, you know, he's busy.
He's busy.
Uh, yeah.
So there you go.
Vote Susan eight, five, five, seven, five, two, four, four, two.
Let's get some callers in before we run out of time.
We got to have fun while we can.
Kurt from Madison.
You are next.
Welcome, Kurt.
What do you
got?
Oh, it's working on my breathing exercise
as
well.
Very good.
Very good.
Yes.
Yes.
Good.
I want to use your conversation with Len to try to cite an example.
of critical thinking.
So if people are on the fence and they look at the money, ignore the money, ignore the commercials, and just go off the facts that you can find at your own fingertips on the computer.
He lied in the debate about the rape kits.
If that alone isn't enough to get you upset, just think of it was your wife, your daughter,
A relative, I don't care who.
This is a guy who does not care about the better interests of the people of this state.
So, for Plexities out there, you can ask it just about any question you want and see what comes back.
This should not be a hard decision for people.
It simply should not.
And I just stress the critical thinking skill level of this.
If you're confused, call the Dom Show.
Get your answers or...
Or you can just get on the computer and ask perplexity your question.
See what comes back.
Perplexity.
I haven't used perplexity.
You'll have to check it out, Kurt.
Thanks for the comment.
Thank you so much.
Do appreciate it as always.
Yeah, people critical thinking.
That's a good thing.
You could use that.
Yeah.
And if you don't know, you can look things up.
Do your own research, as they say, but also be careful of your sources.
See, there's a lot to it.
Not only did.
did BS lie during the debate about the, the, as Kurt says about the rape kids, he lied at the time when he was attorney general about it.
So he's, he's not gotten better.
He's not corrected his, his misdeeds, his lies, his misinformation.
He continues to do it.
And then I will throw on top of that, uh, Len and perhaps Dale from Warsaw, if you're on the fence, um, he continues to bring up.
Milwaukee voting accounting Milwaukee County City of Milwaukee counting the votes the late-night ballot drops I don't know if there's fraud or not man.
That's just how they do it They wanted to change it, but the Republicans wouldn't let them here in the state of Wisconsin So what happens they count those ballots then Brad Shim will continues to deceive don't vote for him vote for Susan Crawford come back eight five five seven five two four eight four two
Broadcasting across the state of Wisconsin on the Civic Media Radio Network and around the world on the Civic Media app.
This is the Dom Salvia Show.
And now here's your host, Dom Salvia.
And welcome to the Dom Salvia Show.
Thank you so much for hanging out with us.
You can be a part, contribute to this fine program.
Call us or text us.
Same number 855-752-484-2855.
75 Civic got just piece working hard on the board for you folks today And we got some breaking news we want to share with you ABC news is reporting judge orders Trump administration to preserve signal chat on Yemen strikes The messages had been set to delete in violation of record-keeping requirements
Now we are already past a week.
So it's certainly possible that
They're gone.
At
least the original
original.
We got the
screenshots.
We have screenshots and we did see for those of us who read through the screenshots that it looks like the setting had been changed from four weeks to one week.
And then at the end of this exchange back to four weeks.
So potentially there's there's still something in that chat.
Yeah, but everyone came down today.
This broke the other day.
So, you
know, they may have gone in there.
They're burning the records.
I mean, the old, you know, man, back in the old days, you had to get the 55 gallon drum, right?
Put a bunch of gasoline and paper in it and burn it all.
On the one hand, things are so much easier to get rid of, but also
Them screenshots are forever.
Yes.
Yes, they are.
ABC News reports, federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to preserve the contents of the chat in which top national security officials use the signal app to discuss military strikes in Yemen as they were taking place earlier this month.
Let's use the app.
Hey, they got an app for that.
Let's go bomb.
Let's go bomb some places.
Hey, we got an app for that.
It's a great idea.
U S district judge, James Bosberg ordered the top cabinet officials named in the lawsuit by the government transparency group, American oversight.
Check them out folks.
I followed them or though on my radar, American oversight to retain any messages sent and received over signal between March 11th and March 15th.
Benjamin Sparks, the lawyer representing American oversight, raised concerns that these messages are in imminent danger of destruction due to the settings within signal that can be set to delete messages automatically prompting the judge to order the Trump administration to file a sworn declaration by this Monday to ensure the messages are preserved.
Yeah, did he give him a verbal order or a written order?
Right, because this is that same judge, Judge Bozburg, who issued the ruling saying that the Trump administration could not deport people based on that 1798 wartime act and, critically and in the verbal order, turn those planes around.
Do
you understand my order?
Yes, Your Honor.
apparently some other people tonight.
Yeah, same judge.
And Trump's really mad about that.
Now these judges are assigned randomly.
Right.
This just happens
to, you know, and I wasn't, uh, who was, who was the judge, uh, in Florida when he was randomly, when Trump was randomly given that judge, uh, Eileen Cannon,
he was very
happy about that
random selection, wasn't
he?
But not so happy about this random.
Oh, right.
This, you know, radical left judge who was initially appointed to the, the federal bench was it
Bush, Bush and then, uh, promoted essentially by
Obama.
Right.
Republican and a Democrat, thinking this guy's worthy of the role that he's in.
Man, maybe he's an objective jurist.
Shocking.
Do they make those anymore?
Can I get one?
We're trying to get one for the Supreme Court.
How much do I gotta pay for my objective jurist?
Apparently about $20 million.
ABC News continued.
The lawsuit, again, the American oversight lawsuit, which names Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, CIA Director John Ratcliffe,
Treasury Secretary Scott Bassent and Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the National Archives as defendants asked the federal judge to declare the use of signal unlawful in order the cabinet members to preserve the records immediately as signals deleting of messages violates governmental record keeping requirements.
Hmm.
We know that they're going to some of the background.
We've covered that quite a bit.
Let me jump down here.
Uh, interesting thought here, uh, Judge Bosberg.
Oh, here we go.
According to screenshots, shots public by the Atlantic messes were set to dispute a certain time frame.
Originally messes were set to be as mentioned one week.
And then according to screenshots, uh, they were updated.
Um, Bosberg declined for now to order the administration officials to disclose if signal had been used by the Trump administration in a wider context.
Well, I thought I think that's very interesting that
at
this moment right now, because this is a question everyone wants to know, right?
Is this administration using signal in a wider context?
The judge declined for now to order them to disclose that a quote.
I don't think at this point that that's something I would be prepared to order.
So if you see or feel all the lights dimming,
that's all the
signal deletions going on in the Trump administration.
Right.
Of
all those things.
Because I mean, good luck.
Right.
And I mean, I feel like it's pretty obvious.
Of course, they're using signal for things.
There's a reason why no one on that signal chat went, hey, maybe we shouldn't be using this platform for our classified exchange of information because it's the platform that they're using.
For everything
for everything
and that's again, and there's lots of cases right now people getting Rendition is at the term I'm getting plucked up and pulled away and sent somewhere else, right?
And if that were to happen call to I don't know it's bad enough that happens to folks that are our citizens of other countries in here legally and perhaps, you know put an op-ed in the school newspaper, you know
criticizing the administration's efforts or criticizing Israel's efforts, whatever the case may be.
If that happens, or if it happens to you, or me, Jess, or me, or any of our audience members, and these cats are using signal to communicate, hey, go get that cat.
Go
get them.
Well,
there's no record of that.
Just gone.
Paper trails gone.
Just gone.
And that's the whole point.
That's one of the reasons they use it.
They've been using it since the Russia, Russia, Russia thing in the Mueller report.
One of the reasons Robert Mueller couldn't get the detailed evidence that he needed.
that was most certainly there is because they were using these kinds of apps.
Yeah.
Yeah, I said it.
On the heels of Trump early Thursday accusing Boseberg on social media of grabbing the Trump cases all to himself, the judge began the hearing by providing a detailed description of the DC district court's automated system for assigning
cases,
including how each judge is allotted electronic cards to ensure cases are fairly distributed.
That's how it works.
And that's how all cases continue to be assigned in this course, Judge Bosberg said.
I mean, we can't be expecting.
the Trump administration to understand how our government works.
It
doesn't matter.
They don't give a damn.
Either you're with us and do what we say, or if you're against us, you're a hulk, you're at this,
you're at that.
It's a witch hunt.
It's a witch
hunt.
It's all these things over and over and over again.
I mean, everything, you ever find it weird that every time a guy gets caught with his hand in the cookie jar, it's a witch hunt?
Right.
I mean, he's very deliberate in his attacks.
is actually right on schedule.
You know
he's
guilty when.
You
know
he did it when.
Wasn't it, wasn't it just last week that we heard from one of the secretary members, Lutnik?
About who a fraudster is it's the one who who complains the loudest
Yes talking about in that in that reference about those who call and complain that their social security checks
might be late correct
those
that are His his mother-in-law, you know the billionaires mother-in-law wouldn't
but
yeah He said the same thing though and he was complaining what he was doing.
It's
correct He was
also kind of giving a tell same with with this administration same with Trump same with you saw that the body language of Pete Hakeseth when he's asked questions
You see this, everything's a personal attack.
No, man.
Oh, they're, they're, they're getting eight.
Well, you know, ask, get an asked a firm question is not abuse, man.
It comes with the job.
And we
should be asking hard and tough and fair questions all the time of everybody who gives a damn, man.
Political persuasions do not matter in that regard.
This is coming from, you know, a journalist like me.
Hey, I asked questions, I'm a journalist.
I'm an old man, I'm confused.
I didn't put that on the board.
855-752-484-2855-757.
So, Judge Boseberg ordering the Trump administration and, you know, how's he gonna force it?
You know, if someone goes and deletes something, for real.
Hey, you gotta keep this, just like you said, turn the planes around.
Right.
They didn't do it.
And they said, oh, you know, national seat, they're going to say the same thing, national secrets, right?
National security.
We're not going to do that.
I'm anxious to see how the Trump administration, you know, continues to push the envelope of, you know, constitutional crisis because they got caught doing something really, really stupid and literally putting people's lives in danger.
And they don't even acknowledge it.
They don't.
And that's so many different parts of it.
Cavalier Way in which, you know, we go about our war efforts.
It looks like a bunch of frat boys with their, with emoji.
What did Jane call them?
The emoji boys.
And the doge bros, you know what I'm saying?
I mean, this is pervasive through it.
Yeah, you know what?
I want people in these roles that are a little more considerate.
I really do.
I don't think, you know, emojis of the American flag and a fist bump and an explosion.
You know, if that's the extent of your intellect and your analysis of what are we're doing, what we're trying to do as a country in our name to open up shipping lanes to, to what, shakedown Egypt and Europe, to some amount of dollars that haven't been defined and perhaps based on the way the SM, Stephen Miller, believe in that text stream said that they don't even know this was coming.
Hey, bang, bang, bang, we did you a favor, pay us.
And who are you paying?
How's it getting paid?
By whom?
And where are you getting for that?
And if you get a little more, and where's it going?
The whole thing is terrible.
And on every single level.
Tell me from breaking the law, right?
These are supposed to be kept.
This is why Judge Bozburg has ordered them to do this.
So right off the bat, they're doing this.
In this manner to evade these open records kind of request we evade the requirements of our federal government boom breaking the law then then they go up and they try to spin in front of in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee right spin lie call it what you want Not good literally putting Members armed forces members lives in danger the bragging
Bragging I don't know why why Higgs thought that this was necessary put this kind of Detailed agenda the breakdown of the timing and the weapons and all you didn't need to do that.
No, I mean, so what was that?
Well, that was that was him bragging I guess that didn't need to be done There's there's there's so many different ways in every single way you look at this in every angle in every aspect It is terrible and it is getting worse and there's no contrition.
There's no admission.
There's no nothing.
There's no consequence yet No, nothing yet
But I'm telling you, Republicans, I mean, you got family and friends and you care about the military, right?
Make America great again?
Is that making America great when you're just so cavalier with this kind of effort and a war effort?
It's a big party joke, man.
Hey, look at the emojis.
God bless.
Give me a break.
Unserious.
Do not deserve to be there.
But you deserve to be with us.
Come back with us.
855-752-4842.
Taking your calls next.
Welcome back to the Dom Salvis show eight five five seven five two four eight four two eight five five seven five Civic just be us working hard on the board.
Oh, love me some of that music Music last late to cheap trick.
Oh, yeah At the forum here downtown Milwaukee.
Ah, Stephanie had a blast.
It was it was great.
Ah But man, you know, we're not getting any younger and no,
no
are our rock stars
But they were there, man.
They were doing it, getting it done.
Still
rocking out.
And I almost went over my, I think I may have gone over my monthly t-shirt budget.
Monthly t-shirt
budget.
Yeah,
I got the cheap trick one.
And I've seen, I've
seen Heart before, like back in the 80s,
but
I don't know if I've ever seen cheap trick.
It's
hard to say, but never, never had this shirt.
So I got that now.
So I got to, I got to wait now a couple
of
weeks.
It joins the arson all of.
black man
t-shirts
they're slimming of course
eight five five seven five two four eight four two uh new topic we'll get to next after the calls trump administration to shrink the federal health agencies by 20 000 employees
oh great because
25 000 was too much and 15 000
not getting her done.
I will get there to your calls and texts as well.
Don from Milwaukee, you will be next.
Welcome Don, what do you got for us?
Good afternoon, Don.
Yeah, I just wanted to let the people know out there.
I was reported by writers.
Elon Musk's, they have access to all our records, you know?
There's a doge staffer He was he has been aided a crime ring they call him a ring of cyber criminals and he he's What he called muscle says he's just awesome He's a 19 year old kid and he's got a his chosen nickname is big balls.
Yep.
Anyhow good good old big balls
He's giving information to a ring of cyber criminals, and I guess they're infiltrating law enforcement emails or hijacking phone numbers.
They're stealing cryptocurrency.
And so I'm just kind of wondering, hey, are our bank accounts, are we going to have any money left in our bank account?
Well, Don, I mean, that's fair question, man.
Fair question.
And it's all over the place.
The independent is reporting this, USA Today, Yahoo.
I mean, this, this guy was basically what?
Tech support for a cyber criminal organization?
Yeah.
Well, you know, no worries.
Hell of a resume, man.
If you want to get in and do some climbing, some real climbing, come and join the doge, man.
I'll put you in.
This is, it's, yeah, Don, check your bank accounts.
855-752-4842.
Mark from the SAC.
You're next.
Welcome, buddy.
What do you got for us?
Oh, there you go.
Welcome.
Pull me in all kinds of different directions here.
I mean that information goes away.
It's kind of like those old spy movies where they, they watch the little video discs now and then all of a sudden it goes burst into flames.
This message will self destruct in five seconds, man.
Mission impossible.
They're still making those movies, Mark.
This information just evaporates.
So these guys could be.
plotting criminal activity.
And yes, we have no idea.
And let's be let's be frank about this.
Mark, I mean, based on the letter of the law, this very activity of using signal in this manner in this way is a crime.
It is a it's criminal activity based on my understanding.
of the records retention laws.
Indeed.
Let alone, let alone, obviously, the problem of putting, you know, the journal was down there.
And who was supposed to?
Oh, my God.
Just so much.
So, yeah, these are the best, huh?
Making America great again by what?
And what are all these efforts for again?
Just why are we doing this?
Why is this happening?
Why, as I get into this new topic, the new headline, why does the Trump administration want to shrink the federal health agencies by 20,000 employees?
Well, Dom,
It's so that they can just squeeze just enough to give their billionaires a nice old tax cut of four trillion dollars.
Four and a half trillion.
Four and a half trillion.
I
mean, but you know, a half a trillion.
Half a trillion, what's that?
That's only
five hundred billion who's counting that.
Right, this is what, this is, this is the, this is the umbrella.
This is what they're telling us.
And it's really hard to believe.
It's really hard to believe.
My understanding of the dashboard of the billions saved continues to go up.
But we know that there was a bunch of BS in there first.
I don't mean to look at it because I don't believe it.
I don't believe it.
They've provided no reliable receipts.
There's nothing that we can actually look at and say, yeah, you seemingly have actually saved a lot of money.
What they have put up is riddled with errors and flat out lies.
Hey, we canceled this big contract.
That was canceled on the Biden administration
That contract's been done for a decade.
It's $8
billion, no man.
It's
like $8 million.
At
most.
At most, and even that was like $2 million.
Right.
I mean, it's not great, but this is what we're dealing with.
This is what I guess the people want.
And where is the savings?
Like, is that in the council?
We're like, where is the money?
Where is that money?
855-752-4842.
Trump administration plans to shrink the workforce of the Department of Health and Human Services by nearly a quarter.
Officials announced today it's part of a major restructuring.
Change is announced on Thursday amount to a workforce that will be around 33% smaller than it was at the end of the Biden administration.
There were 92,620 employees at the department in September of 24 up from 81,000 at the end of the Trump administration.
Around 10,000 full-time employees will be cut.
through the layoffs, in addition to other vacant positions that will not be replaced.
Thousands of full-time staff have already left the department in recent months, in addition to thousands more contractor and fellowship positions that were also eliminated.
A quote, when combined with HHS's other efforts, including early retirement and fork in the road, the restructuring results in a total downsizing from 82,000 to 62,000 full-time employees, the department said in a release,
estimating that taxpayers would save $1.8 billion from the changes.
A fact sheet shared with reporters and senior health officials says that no additional cuts are currently planned beyond those announced Thursday and in recent weeks.
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy will cut 3,500 jobs from the FDA according to the fact sheet and the administration also also cutting 1,200 jobs from the National Institutes of Health.
This reduction will not affect drug, medical device, or food reviewers, nor will it impact inspectors, the fact sheet says.
Oh, great.
Great.
Could you tell me how that works exactly?
I mean, just on the labor hours alone, who's picking up the slack or were they all just really watching Netflix and listening to the Dom Salvia show?
855-752-4842.
Come back with us.
And welcome back to the Dom Salvia show eight five five seven five two four eight four two eight five five seven five Civic it's a phone line.
It's a text line.
You got just PS on the board.
Some of you folks texting in reading Steve from La Crosse so tired of Elon and Donald.
Let's stop this madness in Wisconsin.
They like someone who will really represent each and every one of us.
Amen.
So I'm Sam.
Steve from Milwaukee.
throws out the emojis, the infamous emoji.
I mean, get in these now, the
fist bump,
the American flag and
the explosion.
It's like,
it's a thing now.
Steve wonders how many innocence innocent people died.
Yeah, right?
And that's, and that's the thing.
It's, it's seriousness matters.
I just think it does.
And this, this isn't, you know, party time.
We're putting our people in danger.
We're obviously killing other people.
I mean, this is, this isn't a video game, man.
And you, you emoji boys out there.
This is, it's just so, that's such a disservice.
It's just, it's just terrible.
From
the party that calls themselves pro life.
It's
a little ironic.
Right.
As mentioned, CBS reporting that HHS is going to shrink their workforce.
They're going to fire, lay off about 10,000 people, and they're going to let about another 10,000 positions go on.
filled, which will be totally fine.
I mean, that, you know, now you're
down from
82,000 employees to 62,000 employees.
And I guess there'll be no interruption in the services or the efforts that are put forth by HHS,
which is anyone who has ever worked in any healthcare position ever knows there's so many extraneous people.
So, you know, you'll be fine.
Yeah, I mean, people just sitting around doing nothing, you know, you know,
I guess, watching Netflix as they say.
CBS goes on, they put the letter out there.
Specific notices to employees may be sent as early as Friday, March 28th, nothing like a one day notice.
But also another quote from Kennedy in the video of this announcement.
Here's what, here's what Kennedy had to say, you know, talking to the troops.
The entire federal workforce is downsizing now.
So
This will be a painful period for HHS.
It will be a painful period for HHS.
Now, does that pain, does that translate over to those who use the services of HHS?
Just asking for those who use the services of HHS the health of health officials had been bracing for steep cuts to be announced this week as part of sweeping restructuring architect With the White House Doge several agency officials said they stepped in have have seen stepped up security measures coming into work this morning
You're gonna pack up your desk and get escorted out managers have been Largely in the dark about the changes officials said and aside from a handful of changes already announced with the department We do have some sound I believe of our senator Tammy Baldwin right here from the great state of Wisconsin She has some comments about these cuts and what's going on over at HHS What these cuts will mean for us if you would just let's
Let's do Senator Tammy Baldwin.
We're talking about more kids getting sick from infectious diseases.
We're talking about less support for seniors who rely on Medicaid and Medicare.
We're even potentially talking about families getting sick from things that they buy at the grocery store.
Kennedy said earlier this week at the White House that he and the Doge headed by Moscow identified extraordinary ways to my department at HHS.
Oh, yeah, they did that, huh?
He said what they considered duplicated work for communications, procurement, IT and HR departments across 40 operating divisions of HHS.
We are with ELONS help eliminating the redundancies.
All right, there you go.
Efficiencies, 855-752-4842, 855-755-CIVIC.
Leroy from Milwaukee, you're up.
Welcome.
What do you got for us?
Yes.
You know, they had announced when they made the cut of employees at the IRS that there was no delay in processing the tax forms that are being mailed in.
Well, we just had an experience my brother did that he got a letter from IRS indicating that the payment that he sent in was missing and they wanted to send him a new bill for that amount.
And so what we did is went to the cashier's check that was mailed to the IRS to make that payment.
So we went to the bank.
They gave us a copy of the cancel check with the signature on the back that it had been processed.
Oh, yeah.
Come on.
When you if you call the IRS Wisconsin right now, there's going to be a voice message saying that they are apologizing because people are saying that payments are not posted and that they're behind in posting payments to the tax forms.
So I just wanted
to
let you know about that.
And if you, if you take a time and give them a call, you'll hear the message and they are apologizing for the delay in accepting tax payments.
And you can imagine if someone didn't, you know, go and double check, make sure that check wasn't clear.
They went and got another, you know, cashiers check and send and have that one.
I mean, it's just, it's.
It's terrible.
Hey, thank you so much.
We really appreciate you sharing that with us.
And I think this is going to be, it's going to be across the board, man.
I mean, it's, hey, we're not going to eliminate it.
We're just going to break it.
Right.
And
that will be so much
more efficient because Leroy, how much time did it take out of your day?
Right.
Right.
How much time is it going to take out of every person's day when the services that they need, that they are relying on, that they've known how long it takes?
Now with...
25% fewer staff members, a third fewer staff members, how in
the world- Will it take that much longer?
Will it take that much longer to- No, it's gonna
take more than that because people are going to get burnt out.
You can't just increase someone's workload by 25%, 33% and expect to have the same level of efficiency every day.
You can't
if you're doing it in this department now.
Guess what congratulations now.
You're doing it in all 40 departments, right?
You got a raise Well, you get you got a promotion, but you didn't get a raise correct and and to what end why are we doing this?
Why why is it so important?
Why as as they're claiming here that this reorganization is gonna claim what what's how many billions of dollars I'd see if I can find it here quick while I talk about it.
Oh
Apparently, going from 82,000 to 62,000 full-time employees, they're going to save taxpayers $1.8 billion.
Oh,
good.
So that's not even a tenth of a percent of what they need to give four and a half
terrain dollars.
Hey, you can't get to four and a half trillion dollars and tax cuts for the rich.
If you don't start with $1.8 billion here and $1 billion there.
And again, there is a cost to this, certainly to the, to the folks that are getting fired.
No doubt about it.
And honestly, if you want to have a different conversation about how AI is going to impact a lot of positions, I think that's something to be said.
finance, HR.
I think there's going to be a continued evolution in many ways, certainly in the workforce.
But we're not there yet.
We're not here now.
And what is the point of this?
What is the point?
We're going to save $1.8 billion.
So they can go and give that to
The billionaires now if we're if we're here's appears also the point if we're looking for Savings in these areas.
Are we gonna really really save it or are we just going to?
reduce the taxes of those rich people and and and then so we also reduce the revenue So we're really not saving it.
This is not like there's gonna be money left over They're gonna take that savings and they're gonna reduce the tax burden on the very rich,
right?
This isn't money that's coming to us
Exactly
this this is money that is being taken away from us.
These are services that are being taken away from us
In order to
save just a little bit of money for those trillionaires billionaires trying to become trying
you know all you can do is try Well, I'll tell you what you know, you know the theory and these guys they would give it all away
Just a little bit more
eight five five seven five two four eight four two eight five five Seven five civic but but but not all hope is lost.
Oh, no Kennedy.
He's got an idea.
Oh, yeah,
he's gonna spend some money
Yeah, we're actually we for all of the services that we're cutting for all of the research that we're cutting
Yes, we
are actually gonna be investing just a little bit of money into some very very important research
We want to know, is there a link between vaccines and autism?
we're doing this again we're doing this again oh because you know the last study didn't go the way they wanted to or the one before that the one before that New York Times report he Kennedy turns to a discredited vaccine skeptic for autism study i mean who better to lead the study than a discredited vaccine skeptic again that's the new york times claiming this david geyer g e i er has been hired as a senior
data analyst at HHS.
Well, I guess they're firing some people.
They fired 20,000 and they hired the discredited vaccine skeptic.
According to several people, he will examine any potential links between vaccines and autism that were debunked long ago.
Here's the link.
Some people get vaccines.
Some people have autism.
The link there, people.
And, you know, 98% of them drank milk at some point in their life.
I mean, is it milk?
What's going on here?
A steadfast figure in the anti-vaccine movement, according to the New York Times, who has helped shape Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'
's thinking on a possible link to autism, has joined the department to work on a study examining the long debunk theory, according to people familiar with the matter.
David Geyer has published numerous articles in the medical literature
attempting to tie mercury in vaccines to autism.
In 2012, state authorities in Maryland found that he had been practicing medicine without a license, without a license, alongside his father, who was a doctor at the time.
I mean, hey, pause the doctor and he's in the building.
So I'm a doctor.
Let me just come on, man.
You know, you gotta be a licensed bartender in the city of Milwaukee.
You can't serve the drinks unless you're a bartender.
And if you're not, you can't get around that so long as there's like a licensed bartender on site.
Then you can do it.
I don't think it works the same in the medical community.
I hope it doesn't.
No.
Wow.
Wow.
Okay.
I didn't know that little part.
So there we go.
Practicing without it, without a license.
It's bad.
Maryland authorities also suspended his medical license following claims that he endangered children with autism and exploited their parents according to state records.
Let's have this guy lead the study.
The federal judges have rejected their research on autism and vaccines as too unreliable to stand up in court.
Well, good news.
Now you got all sorts of space and money to go through this process again.
David Geyer's new government role has stunned public health experts who had already expressed concerns about Kennedy's decisions to cancel a long-held vaccine meeting and cut grants focused on understanding vaccine hesitancy.
Well, give me the money.
I'll tell you why.
People like Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
That's why.
In addition, David Guy's involvement in government research heightens their fears that vaccine confidence could be further eroded, especially after Kennedy's recent embrace of questionable alternative treatments for measles during the sprawling outbreak in Texas.
I believe that continues to go, continues to grow.
Dr. Christopher Byrer, director of the Duke Global Health Institute.
If we increase vaccine hesitancy and immunization rates go down further, we will see more vaccine preventable disease outbreaks.
That's how it works.
What do you say?
When the measles out, let's take your vitamins.
What was this?
Oh yeah, cod liver oil, vitamin A, something that does not in any way prevent the measles.
Occasionally, occasionally used as supportive
for those who have deficiencies of vitamin A, not a cure, not a preventative measure.
You know, he probably just wants to cut the head off the cod and then tie it to the roof of his car.
Probably.
And then bring it home and have the brain head guts spill into the car on his kids.
Yeah, definitely.
Or he could take that baby, the cub and put it in the park.
Right, as a prank.
It's funny.
Yeah, these guys are great.
So there are priorities over at HHS.
And it's not what you think it is.
Come back with us.
One final segment will get your calls up, but you know the rules.
You know the rules.
Final segment of the day.
You got to tell us something good.
You got to put a smile on our face.
We'll wrap the day up with a great attitude.
Ready to roll into Friday.
Join us 855-752-4842-855-757.
Thank you.
you
Welcome back to the Dom salvia show last segment of the day if you guys something to say hit us up right now eight five five seven five two four eight four two eight five five Seven five a civic, but you know the role man Tell us something good and the day with a smile on your face Let me throw out there quickly just a little bit more and then we'll get to the colors eight five five seven five civic RFK jr.
Reorganizing HHS based on the
Recommendations of the very smart knows everything and never makes a mistake Elon Musk.
Here's what our FK junior had to say.
We aren't just reducing bureaucratic sprawl.
We are realigning the organization with its core mission and our new priorities in reversing the chronic disease epidemic.
This department will do more, a lot more at a lower cost to the taxpayer.
Just not how it works.
Now, just for the record, HHS is the umbrella agency that includes the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Uh-oh.
The Food and Drug Administration.
We don't need that.
The National Institutes of Health and other smaller divisions.
Medicare, huh?
You gonna make sure Medicare is gonna keep working?
Yeah, all the, all the, all those older, very, very involved and active older folks that are on Medicare, they're, they think they're going to handle and put up with your nonsense.
They think that you can do more with 20,000 less people because you got what redundancies and 40 departments because there's 40 IT departments and 40 HR departments.
Okay.
855-752-4842.
Be careful what you wish for.
Ah, let's get to it.
Tell us something good.
Oh, real quick.
Cam from Appleton, you're up.
Go.
Oh, hey, something good.
I don't know.
I mean, my dogs bring me a lot of happiness.
They got stupid, derpy smiles on their face all the time, and ball is life, man.
All right, man.
I had originally called in to help
illustrate uh very easily for folks to understand why the return from office order and the um the fact that they're consolidating stuff like it is not going to save anyone money and it's actually going to cost way more
why
a lot of government sold a lot of their office spaces and buildings which office space whenever a company hires an employee it's about 120 percent of whatever their salary is is the cost to house them in office per year
And then the...
All the office spaces are going to be repurchased.
Um, everything else costs way more than it did when they had office
space.
Right.
And Cam, my understanding, I hate to cut your show.
We got another caller.
We got to get to my understanding is that some people are going back to no office.
It ain't there.
Uh, thanks for calling Mike Clemens, civic media's sports reporter, checking in.
Uh, thank you for doing so, Mike.
I was hoping to catch you at the last minute here.
Welcome back to the show, man.
Opening day, the brewers today, how to go and how you feeling, buddy?
Well, I don't have good news for you.
They ended up losing to the Yankees 4-2.
It was dramatic at the end.
Remember Devin Williams, who they traded to the Yankees after he had blown save in the playoffs against the Mets.
So today he comes on top of the ninth.
He's got a 4-1 lead.
He loads the bases with no outs.
Oh,
baby!
Oh, baby!
and uh... they you know jake bower came in he managed to uh... get another run across but then devin o'aim's you know settled in and he struck out jackson trio and christian yellowish to
uh... so it's not
able to get it we're not able to get a lot of uh... base runners on today you know carlford on this former white socks and and uh... giant picture did a good job that will be all the guy you know one thing today was to find out so who is you know
Who is this new team going to look like?
You know, Churio was the leadoff batter.
Yelich was the DH, Contreras, Reece Hoskins, Sal Freilich is back.
So the new name is at third base was that Vinnie Capra, this kid that had six home runs in spring training.
He had a solo shot for the Brewers
at
Yankee Stadium.
Yeah.
And so that was nice.
Bryce Trang, he had a shoulder injury, but he was able to play second base and look good there.
So, you know, it looked okay.
The Brewers pitching, I mean, Pat Murphy told Joe Buck, because the game was on ESPN, that of the 13 pitchers, the Brewers got on the roster right now, eight of them are currently injured.
So that's going to be hard, you know, getting into this season.
And then the Brewers home opener on Monday.
Mike Coleman, Civic Media's sports reporter, Christian Yellich.
I saw a picture of him with a fine suit paying homage to you today.
This is the first time and it's, it's hard to believe in, in how many years since you has not been a part of a brewer broadcast and opening day.
Well, you know,
forever,
40 years, I mean, 53,
53, I think.
Yeah.
No, a Yelly came in with a loud plan.
Isn't that the best?
That is the best.
That is, that is.
Uh, so Mike, uh, no, I was joking at one, when the Brewers lost, cause you know how we fans are sometimes they're so fickle and all they lost the game is totally over.
Some of you are, some of you are.
Uh, it's a long season.
We got a lot to go.
Um, and what do you think, man?
We got 60 seconds less.
How hopeful are you for the Brewers this season?
You know the thing is the ends of bitters of Brewer's seasons Dom are so bitter sweet,
right?
Yeah, but then you forget These guys have gone to the postseason six of the last seven years and they've won the division You know back to back to two of the last three years or so
So, you know, Matt Arnold is the unsung hero, the GM.
He keeps playing this great young talent.
It should be probably another good year at American Family Field.
All right, we appreciate it.
Thank you, Mike Clemens, Civic Media Sports reporter, opening day brewers.
Take the loss in New York against the Yankees opening day here, I believe next week.
Thank you, Mike.
Now, folks, stick around.
Pete Schwabber from the Nightlight is coming up next.
We'll be back tomorrow.
Have a wonderful evening.
Stick around.