The redistricting war is over — and nobody won. Texas, North Carolina, and Missouri redrew their maps to favor Republicans. California and Virginia redrew theirs to favor Democrats. The net partisan result? Roughly a wash.

But the country now has dozens more safe seats than it had a year ago. More districts where the outcome is guaranteed. Fewer races where candidates have to compete — and less reason for your representative to listen to you.

Both sides fired. Both sides hit. And the casualties were competitive elections.

There are two bills in Congress that could end this for good. The Redistricting Reform Act would ban mid-decade redistricting and require independent commissions. The Fair Representation Act would replace single-member districts with proportional representation — making gerrymandering structurally impossible.

One fixes the process. The other makes the process irrelevant.

Learn More

The 2025-2026 redistricting arms race was the most aggressive mid-decade map redrawing since the 1800s. Six states enacted new congressional maps between the 2024 and 2026 elections. Before 2025, only two states had conducted voluntary mid-decade redistricting since 1970. (Ballotpedia; Congressional Research Service)

Republican-drawn maps (permanent): Texas redrew its maps in summer 2025 at President Trump's urging, adding five Republican-leaning seats. North Carolina and Missouri followed. These maps have no sunset clause, no trigger condition, and no expiration date. They remain in effect until someone redraws them. (ABC News)

Democratic-drawn maps (temporary): California voters approved Proposition 50 in November 2025, allowing the legislature to temporarily bypass the state's independent redistricting commission. The maps expire in 2030 and the commission resumes control. Virginia voters approved a constitutional amendment on April 21, 2026, allowing mid-decade redistricting — it also sunsets after October 2030, and the state's bipartisan redistricting commission resumes. (UC Berkeley/IGS; Ballotpedia; VPAP)

The process asymmetry is striking. In California and Virginia, voters had a direct say — California's maps required approval via Proposition 50, and Virginia's required a statewide referendum. Voters could see the proposed maps before voting. In Texas, North Carolina, and Missouri, the legislature acted without putting the question to voters. North Carolina's state law doesn't even allow the governor to veto redistricting maps. Texas has no citizen initiative process, meaning voters have no mechanism to override the legislature on redistricting. (Texas Tribune; Ballotpedia)

Where voters have been asked, they've pushed back. A poll of Texas voters (Emerson College, August 2025) found 38% opposed mid-decade redistricting while 36% supported it — with 26% unsure. Separately, Brookings cited a poll finding 68% of Texans called a mid-decade redistricting plan that favored one party "a major problem." In Florida, a poll found a majority of voters — including a plurality of Republicans — opposed mid-decade redistricting. In Missouri, opponents collected enough signatures to force a veto referendum onto the November 2026 ballot, giving voters a direct say on whether to keep the legislature's maps. (Emerson College via KXAN; Brookings; WLRN; PBS News)

The pattern: When redistricting is put to voters, they tend to oppose partisan map manipulation regardless of which party benefits. The states where maps were redrawn without voter input are the ones where polling shows the most public discomfort with the process.

The net partisan result is roughly a wash. Both sides gained and lost seats. But the real damage is structural: the country now has dozens more safe, noncompetitive seats. More districts where the outcome is predetermined. Fewer races where candidates have to earn broad support — and less accountability for the representatives who win them. Brookings noted that high-profile Democratic challengers and public opposition could cause the Republican strategy to backfire in 2026. (Brookings)

The Redistricting Reform Act (H.R. 5449 / S. 2885), led by Rep. Zoe Lofgren and Sen. Alex Padilla, would ban mid-decade redistricting nationwide and require every state to establish independent redistricting commissions. It has 56 House cosponsors and 3 Senate cosponsors (Padilla, Warnock, King). All Democrats and one Independent — no Republican support so far. Common Cause and former Attorney General Eric Holder have endorsed it. (Rep. Lofgren press release; Sen. Padilla press release; Census Project)

The Fair Representation Act (H.R. 4632) goes further. It would repeal the 1967 Uniform Congressional District Act and replace single-member districts with multi-member districts using proportional ranked-choice voting. Under this system, gerrymandering becomes structurally impossible — because no matter how you draw a multi-member district, the seats reflect the votes. (FairVote)

Further reading:

• Ballotpedia, "Redistricting Ahead of the 2026 Elections" — comprehensive tracker of all state activity
• The Fulcrum, "Gerrymandering Tests the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026"
• Center for American Progress, "Trump Ordered Texas to Gerrymander"
• MultiState, "State Redistricting Legal Challenges Intensify"
• Wikipedia, "2025-2026 United States Redistricting"

General gerrymandering resources: See CM-5 for links to PlanScore, Princeton Gerrymandering Project, MIT Election Data + Science Lab, Brennan Center, and Dave's Redistricting App.

Related Civic Minute segments: The Redistricting Arms Race (CM-12), The End of Gerrymandering (CM-16), What It Would Take (CM-17), Competition (CM-8)